Influence of Politics in the Commissioning and Design of Projects : A Case Study of Royal Clock Tower (Abraj Al-Bait), Mecca, Saudi Arabia

Aminu Bn Musa, Sanusi Sani Maimagani, Rukayyatu Bashiru Tukur
{"title":"Influence of Politics in the Commissioning and Design of Projects : A Case Study of Royal Clock Tower (Abraj Al-Bait), Mecca, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Aminu Bn Musa, Sanusi Sani Maimagani, Rukayyatu Bashiru Tukur","doi":"10.12816/0059145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the history of architectural projects commissioning, particularly when the practice of architecture became influential, politics became the day's order in project/design commissioning. In this respect, the study seeks to understand how the third tallest building in the world and the most expensive building was commissioned. Are there any political inclination in the commissioning process, if yes, what are the issues involved. The study relies on the review of relevant literature to make inferences. One of the issues find out by the study is that political influence can be objectively employed or abused; two examples were drawn to this respect; a case of the Seagram building and how a client's daughter uses her influence to convince her father to commission an architect Mies van der Rohe. The other is a highly influential client, an eccentric millionaire whose stringent conditions forced Le Corbusier to abandon the commission he signed. The study finds out that The Royal Clock Tower building project's influence is between the developer of the project and the Saudi government. The developer – Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), has long ties with the Saudi government. As such, since its","PeriodicalId":225616,"journal":{"name":"Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0059145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the history of architectural projects commissioning, particularly when the practice of architecture became influential, politics became the day's order in project/design commissioning. In this respect, the study seeks to understand how the third tallest building in the world and the most expensive building was commissioned. Are there any political inclination in the commissioning process, if yes, what are the issues involved. The study relies on the review of relevant literature to make inferences. One of the issues find out by the study is that political influence can be objectively employed or abused; two examples were drawn to this respect; a case of the Seagram building and how a client's daughter uses her influence to convince her father to commission an architect Mies van der Rohe. The other is a highly influential client, an eccentric millionaire whose stringent conditions forced Le Corbusier to abandon the commission he signed. The study finds out that The Royal Clock Tower building project's influence is between the developer of the project and the Saudi government. The developer – Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), has long ties with the Saudi government. As such, since its
政治对项目调试和设计的影响:以沙特阿拉伯麦加皇家钟楼(Abraj Al-Bait)为例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信