The Impact of Emergency Remote Learning on a Studio Curriculum Analyzed via Case Studies

Traci A. M. Lamar, Kate Nartker, Janet M. Woodbridge
{"title":"The Impact of Emergency Remote Learning on a Studio Curriculum Analyzed via Case Studies","authors":"Traci A. M. Lamar, Kate Nartker, Janet M. Woodbridge","doi":"10.1080/20511787.2022.2086389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the impact of emergency remote learning on a studio-based curriculum via case studies of three woven design courses within a comprehensive textile design curriculum. The pedagogy of the textile design studio is characterized by a physical space with appropriate resources for the techniques to be taught, learning through extended practice in that space, collaboration with peers and experts, and critique. Moving a course out of the physical studio space and into the remote learning environment makes the implementation of traditional studio practice and proven teaching methods unattainable, creating extensive challenges. However, the necessity of transitioning studio courses to emergency remote learning also led to innovations in teaching practice and new approaches to achieving learning outcomes. Using case studies the authors analyze the advantages and limitations associated with the transition to remote learning within the framework provided by Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Through the analysis, the authors bridge in-person and online experiences to identify key components of studio learning in a woven design curriculum. The role of the physical studio environment in helping students progress from understanding basic concepts to creating innovative design solutions is discussed. Due to the commonality of studio-based instruction across textile and apparel design curricula, results of this analysis have application to a range of fashion and textile design disciplines.","PeriodicalId":275893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2022.2086389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the impact of emergency remote learning on a studio-based curriculum via case studies of three woven design courses within a comprehensive textile design curriculum. The pedagogy of the textile design studio is characterized by a physical space with appropriate resources for the techniques to be taught, learning through extended practice in that space, collaboration with peers and experts, and critique. Moving a course out of the physical studio space and into the remote learning environment makes the implementation of traditional studio practice and proven teaching methods unattainable, creating extensive challenges. However, the necessity of transitioning studio courses to emergency remote learning also led to innovations in teaching practice and new approaches to achieving learning outcomes. Using case studies the authors analyze the advantages and limitations associated with the transition to remote learning within the framework provided by Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Through the analysis, the authors bridge in-person and online experiences to identify key components of studio learning in a woven design curriculum. The role of the physical studio environment in helping students progress from understanding basic concepts to creating innovative design solutions is discussed. Due to the commonality of studio-based instruction across textile and apparel design curricula, results of this analysis have application to a range of fashion and textile design disciplines.
通过案例分析应急远程学习对工作室课程的影响
摘要本文通过对综合纺织设计课程中三门编织设计课程的案例研究,探讨了应急远程学习对工作室课程的影响。纺织设计工作室的教学方法的特点是一个物理空间,有适当的资源来教授技术,通过在该空间的扩展实践来学习,与同行和专家合作,以及批评。将一门课程从物理工作室空间转移到远程学习环境中,使得传统的工作室实践和经过验证的教学方法无法实现,带来了广泛的挑战。然而,将工作室课程过渡到紧急远程学习的必要性也导致了教学实践的创新和实现学习成果的新方法。通过案例研究,作者分析了布鲁姆修订分类法提供的框架内向远程学习过渡的优势和局限性。通过分析,作者将面对面和在线体验联系起来,以确定编织设计课程中工作室学习的关键组成部分。讨论了物理工作室环境在帮助学生从理解基本概念到创造创新设计解决方案的过程中所起的作用。由于纺织品和服装设计课程中以工作室为基础的教学的共性,这一分析的结果适用于一系列时装和纺织品设计学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信