Risk Management Of German Fruit Producers

Annkatrin Porsch, M. Gandorfer, V. Bitsch
{"title":"Risk Management Of German Fruit Producers","authors":"Annkatrin Porsch, M. Gandorfer, V. Bitsch","doi":"10.15414/RAAE.2018.21.01.10-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Horticultural farms in Germany face substantial business risks. However, fruit farms often struggle to implement appropriate risk management processes, and the risk management literature widely has ignored this farm type. The aim of the study was to improve the assessment of risks by farmers and the choice of suitable risk management instruments. Therefore, a risk management process based on subjective probabilities and suitable for small and medium-sized farms was developed, considering the specific needs of family run businesses. An online survey was conducted to achieve a comprehensive view of the risk perception and risk management practices of German fruit producers. Price and production risks are the most relevant risk categories for fruit farmers. However, among single risk sources, those in the people risk category were seen as the most important. Results show significant interactions among risk categories and a significant correlation between loss experience and the rating of risk categories. The assumption that risk averse farmers generally rate risks higher than risk neutral or risk seeking farmers cannot be confirmed. Diversification seems to be the most important risk management instrument for many fruit producers, especially diversification of marketing channels, farm income, and production activities. Further research should focus on the apparent inconsistency between the satisfaction with instruments reported by farmers and the actual implementation of many of them (e.g., hail insurance and anti-hail net). Furthermore, there is a need for research, to develop decision models considering the interactions of risks and risk management instruments, loss experience and risk seeking attitudes.","PeriodicalId":320413,"journal":{"name":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/RAAE.2018.21.01.10-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Horticultural farms in Germany face substantial business risks. However, fruit farms often struggle to implement appropriate risk management processes, and the risk management literature widely has ignored this farm type. The aim of the study was to improve the assessment of risks by farmers and the choice of suitable risk management instruments. Therefore, a risk management process based on subjective probabilities and suitable for small and medium-sized farms was developed, considering the specific needs of family run businesses. An online survey was conducted to achieve a comprehensive view of the risk perception and risk management practices of German fruit producers. Price and production risks are the most relevant risk categories for fruit farmers. However, among single risk sources, those in the people risk category were seen as the most important. Results show significant interactions among risk categories and a significant correlation between loss experience and the rating of risk categories. The assumption that risk averse farmers generally rate risks higher than risk neutral or risk seeking farmers cannot be confirmed. Diversification seems to be the most important risk management instrument for many fruit producers, especially diversification of marketing channels, farm income, and production activities. Further research should focus on the apparent inconsistency between the satisfaction with instruments reported by farmers and the actual implementation of many of them (e.g., hail insurance and anti-hail net). Furthermore, there is a need for research, to develop decision models considering the interactions of risks and risk management instruments, loss experience and risk seeking attitudes.
德国水果生产商的风险管理
德国的园艺农场面临着巨大的商业风险。然而,水果农场往往难以实施适当的风险管理流程,风险管理文献广泛忽视了这种农场类型。该研究的目的是提高农民对风险的评估和选择合适的风险管理工具。因此,考虑到家庭经营企业的具体需求,开发了一种基于主观概率的适合中小型农场的风险管理流程。进行了一项在线调查,以全面了解德国水果生产商的风险认知和风险管理实践。价格和生产风险是果农最关心的风险类别。然而,在单一风险来源中,人类风险类别被认为是最重要的。结果表明,风险类别之间存在显著的相互作用,损失经历与风险类别评级之间存在显著的相关性。风险厌恶型农民对风险的评价通常高于风险中性或风险寻求型农民的假设无法得到证实。对许多水果生产者来说,多样化似乎是最重要的风险管理手段,尤其是销售渠道、农场收入和生产活动的多样化。进一步的研究应侧重于农民对报告的工具的满意度与其中许多工具(例如冰雹保险和防冰雹网)的实际实施之间的明显不一致。此外,还需要进行研究,开发考虑风险和风险管理工具、损失经验和风险寻求态度之间相互作用的决策模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信