School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Bullying:Contact with Victims, Strategies for Intervention and Preparedness

G. Blood, I. Blood
{"title":"School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Bullying:Contact with Victims, Strategies for Intervention and Preparedness","authors":"G. Blood, I. Blood","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anti-bullying initiatives provide support for school-based programs that change the school climate and involve all school personnel. This study examined school-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) contact with and exposure to bullying, intervention strategies and preparedness for addressing bullying issues. Methods: A mailed survey consisting of four factors on bullying was completed by 418 school-based SLPs. The majority of participants were female (95.5%) with a mean age=43.7 years old; a mean of 18.3 years working and mean caseload size of 47.8 students. Results: The majority of SLPs (84.9%) thought bullying was a problem in the school(s) where they worked. More than half (65.1%) reported they had observed students being bullied in the last month and 14.6% reported a student had told them directly about the bullying incident in the last month. All SLPs (100%) indicated they would confront or stop the bulling immediately, report the episode to administrators and offer support to victims. 14.8% of the original sample reported addressing bullying issues was not in their scope of practice or job responsibilities. Conclusions: Most SLPs thought bullying was a problem and reported they would assist student victims in various ways. SLPs were undecided about using questionable strategies like \"telling the victim to ignore the bully\" or \"to stand up for themselves\". SLPs were less likely to intervene with either the bully or bystanders when compared to the victim. SLPs stated they received training in addressing bullying issues but did not necessarily feel prepared.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anti-bullying initiatives provide support for school-based programs that change the school climate and involve all school personnel. This study examined school-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) contact with and exposure to bullying, intervention strategies and preparedness for addressing bullying issues. Methods: A mailed survey consisting of four factors on bullying was completed by 418 school-based SLPs. The majority of participants were female (95.5%) with a mean age=43.7 years old; a mean of 18.3 years working and mean caseload size of 47.8 students. Results: The majority of SLPs (84.9%) thought bullying was a problem in the school(s) where they worked. More than half (65.1%) reported they had observed students being bullied in the last month and 14.6% reported a student had told them directly about the bullying incident in the last month. All SLPs (100%) indicated they would confront or stop the bulling immediately, report the episode to administrators and offer support to victims. 14.8% of the original sample reported addressing bullying issues was not in their scope of practice or job responsibilities. Conclusions: Most SLPs thought bullying was a problem and reported they would assist student victims in various ways. SLPs were undecided about using questionable strategies like "telling the victim to ignore the bully" or "to stand up for themselves". SLPs were less likely to intervene with either the bully or bystanders when compared to the victim. SLPs stated they received training in addressing bullying issues but did not necessarily feel prepared.
基于学校的语言病理学家对欺凌的感知:与受害者的接触,干预策略和准备
目标:反欺凌倡议为改变学校氛围和涉及所有学校人员的校本项目提供支持。本研究考察了学校语言病理学家与霸凌的接触和接触、干预策略和应对霸凌问题的准备情况。方法:采用邮寄问卷的方式,对418名学校学生进行欺凌行为调查。大多数参与者为女性(95.5%),平均年龄为43.7岁;平均工作时间为18.3年,平均个案数量为47.8名学生。结果:大多数学生(84.9%)认为他们工作的学校存在欺凌问题。超过一半(65.1%)的受访教师表示,他们在上个月曾目睹学生被欺负,14.6%的受访教师表示,上月曾有学生直接向他们讲述欺凌事件。所有slp(100%)表示,他们会立即面对或制止欺凌行为,向管理人员报告这一事件,并为受害者提供支持。14.8%的原始样本表示,解决欺凌问题不在他们的实践范围或工作职责范围内。结论:大多数特殊教师认为欺凌是一个问题,并报告说他们会以各种方式帮助学生受害者。slp还没有决定是否使用“告诉受害者不要理会欺负者”或“为自己挺身而出”等有问题的策略。与受害者相比,slp不太可能干预欺凌者或旁观者。slp表示,他们接受了处理欺凌问题的培训,但不一定觉得准备好了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信