A Comparison of Path Planning Algorithms for Omni-Directional Robots in Dynamic Environments

Felipe Haro, M. Torres
{"title":"A Comparison of Path Planning Algorithms for Omni-Directional Robots in Dynamic Environments","authors":"Felipe Haro, M. Torres","doi":"10.1109/LARS.2006.334319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope of this paper is to analyze and compare three path planning methods for omni-directional robots, which are based on a) the bug algorithm, b) the potential fields algorithm, and c) the A* algorithm for minimum cost path with multiresolution grids. The approaches are compared in terms of computational costs and the resulting path lengths. Results obtained indicate that the bug algorithm is a suitable choice for this type of application as its computational cost is lower than that of the other methods. Furthermore, minor modifications of the standard bug algorithm, such as the tangent following modification, allow the path planner to handle well the situations encountered in typical multi-robot environments","PeriodicalId":129005,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE 3rd Latin American Robotics Symposium","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE 3rd Latin American Robotics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS.2006.334319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The scope of this paper is to analyze and compare three path planning methods for omni-directional robots, which are based on a) the bug algorithm, b) the potential fields algorithm, and c) the A* algorithm for minimum cost path with multiresolution grids. The approaches are compared in terms of computational costs and the resulting path lengths. Results obtained indicate that the bug algorithm is a suitable choice for this type of application as its computational cost is lower than that of the other methods. Furthermore, minor modifications of the standard bug algorithm, such as the tangent following modification, allow the path planner to handle well the situations encountered in typical multi-robot environments
动态环境下全向机器人路径规划算法比较
本文的范围是分析和比较三种全向机器人的路径规划方法,即基于a) bug算法、b)势场算法和c)多分辨率网格下最小代价路径的a *算法。在计算成本和产生的路径长度方面比较了这两种方法。结果表明,bug算法的计算成本比其他方法低,是这类应用的合适选择。此外,对标准bug算法的微小修改,如切线跟随修改,使路径规划器能够很好地处理典型多机器人环境中遇到的情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信