{"title":"Analysis of pregnant women with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus without oral glucose tolerance test confirmation in early pregnancy","authors":"A. Zavratnik, M. Krajnc","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this analysis was to determine the proportion of pregnant women referred by gynaecologists to the outpatient diabetes clinic of the University Medical Centre Maribor with a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on inappropriately measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Additionally, we wanted to compare pregnancy outcomes in subgroups diagnosed later as having GDM vs. no–GDM with oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in the 24th to 28th week of pregnancy, but declared as “probably not having GDM” in early pregnancy. \nMethods: We reviewed retrospectively data on 81 pregnancies referred to our centre, from August 2013 to July 2014, with a diagnosis of early GDM that we did not con-firm with OGTT retesting. After retesting, women were followed up routinely by a gynaecologist, but those with a diagnostic OGTT, performed in the 24th to 28th week, were referred back to a diabetologist. \nResults: The age of the entire cohort was 30.5±4.7 years, and 91% were ≥25 years old; 40% were overweight before pregnancy. The period of fasting before FPG measurement was less than 8 hours in 36%. When comparing the GDM vs. no–GDM subgroups, a higher proportion of women with GDM were fasted for less than 8 hours before FPG measurement (75% vs. 32%; p=0.022), and birth weight was higher for women with GDM (3778±588 g vs. 3316±618 g; p=0.048). There were no differences in macrosomia, eclampsia, Caesarean delivery and birth trauma. \nConclusion: The accuracy of the diagnosis of early pregnancy GDM can be improved by following the FPG measurement protocol. When a single FPG in early pregnancy is near normal we suggest retesting with an OGTT. This approach probably has no adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this analysis was to determine the proportion of pregnant women referred by gynaecologists to the outpatient diabetes clinic of the University Medical Centre Maribor with a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on inappropriately measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Additionally, we wanted to compare pregnancy outcomes in subgroups diagnosed later as having GDM vs. no–GDM with oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in the 24th to 28th week of pregnancy, but declared as “probably not having GDM” in early pregnancy.
Methods: We reviewed retrospectively data on 81 pregnancies referred to our centre, from August 2013 to July 2014, with a diagnosis of early GDM that we did not con-firm with OGTT retesting. After retesting, women were followed up routinely by a gynaecologist, but those with a diagnostic OGTT, performed in the 24th to 28th week, were referred back to a diabetologist.
Results: The age of the entire cohort was 30.5±4.7 years, and 91% were ≥25 years old; 40% were overweight before pregnancy. The period of fasting before FPG measurement was less than 8 hours in 36%. When comparing the GDM vs. no–GDM subgroups, a higher proportion of women with GDM were fasted for less than 8 hours before FPG measurement (75% vs. 32%; p=0.022), and birth weight was higher for women with GDM (3778±588 g vs. 3316±618 g; p=0.048). There were no differences in macrosomia, eclampsia, Caesarean delivery and birth trauma.
Conclusion: The accuracy of the diagnosis of early pregnancy GDM can be improved by following the FPG measurement protocol. When a single FPG in early pregnancy is near normal we suggest retesting with an OGTT. This approach probably has no adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes.
目的:本分析的目的是确定由妇科医生转介到马里博尔大学医学中心糖尿病门诊就诊的孕妇的比例,这些孕妇根据不适当的空腹血糖(FPG)测量诊断为妊娠糖尿病(GDM)。此外,我们想比较妊娠24 - 28周后通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)诊断为GDM和非GDM的亚组的妊娠结局,但在妊娠早期被宣布为“可能没有GDM”。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2013年8月至2014年7月81例到我们中心就诊的妊娠数据,这些妊娠诊断为早期GDM,但我们没有通过OGTT重新检测来证实。重新检测后,妇科医生对妇女进行常规随访,但在第24周至第28周进行OGTT诊断的妇女则被转介给糖尿病医生。结果:整个队列的年龄为30.5±4.7岁,91%年龄≥25岁;40%的人在怀孕前超重。36%的患者FPG测定前禁食时间小于8小时。当比较GDM和非GDM亚组时,GDM女性在FPG测量前禁食少于8小时的比例更高(75%对32%;p=0.022), GDM女性的出生体重更高(3778±588 g vs. 3316±618 g;p = 0.048)。在巨大儿、子痫、剖宫产和分娩创伤方面差异无统计学意义。结论:采用FPG测量方案可提高早期妊娠期GDM诊断的准确性。当妊娠早期单个FPG接近正常时,我们建议用OGTT重新检测。这种方法可能对妊娠结局没有不良影响。