The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems

M. C. Jensen
{"title":"The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems","authors":"M. C. Jensen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.93988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, which is based on the author's Presidential address to the American Finance Association in 1993, argues that squeezing out excess capital and capacity is one of the most formidable ongoing challenges facing not only the U.S. economy, but the economies of all industrialized nations. In making this argument, the article draws striking parallels between the 19th‐century industrial revolution and worldwide economic developments in the last three decades. In both periods, technological advances led to not only sharp increases in productivity and dramatic reductions in prices, but also massive obsolescence and overcapacity. And much as the great M&A wave of the 1890s reduced capacity by consolidating some 1,800 companies into roughly 150, the leveraged takeovers, LBOs, and other leveraged recapitalizations of the 1980s provided “healthy adjustments” to overcapacity that was building in many sectors of the U.S. economy. To help public companies make the necessary adjustments to overcapacity, the author urges them to consider adopting some of the features of private equity, including significant equity stakes for managers, high leverage or payouts, and the recruiting of active investors as “partners in the business.”","PeriodicalId":184715,"journal":{"name":"CGA: Governance & Internal Control Systems (Topic)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9250","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGA: Governance & Internal Control Systems (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.93988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9250

Abstract

This article, which is based on the author's Presidential address to the American Finance Association in 1993, argues that squeezing out excess capital and capacity is one of the most formidable ongoing challenges facing not only the U.S. economy, but the economies of all industrialized nations. In making this argument, the article draws striking parallels between the 19th‐century industrial revolution and worldwide economic developments in the last three decades. In both periods, technological advances led to not only sharp increases in productivity and dramatic reductions in prices, but also massive obsolescence and overcapacity. And much as the great M&A wave of the 1890s reduced capacity by consolidating some 1,800 companies into roughly 150, the leveraged takeovers, LBOs, and other leveraged recapitalizations of the 1980s provided “healthy adjustments” to overcapacity that was building in many sectors of the U.S. economy. To help public companies make the necessary adjustments to overcapacity, the author urges them to consider adopting some of the features of private equity, including significant equity stakes for managers, high leverage or payouts, and the recruiting of active investors as “partners in the business.”
现代工业革命、退出与内部控制制度失效
这篇文章是根据作者1993年在美国金融协会(American Finance Association)发表的总统演讲改编的。文章认为,挤出过剩的资本和产能,不仅是美国经济面临的最艰巨的挑战之一,也是所有工业化国家经济面临的最艰巨的挑战之一。在提出这一论点时,文章将19世纪的工业革命与过去三十年的全球经济发展进行了惊人的对比。在这两个时期,技术进步不仅导致了生产率的急剧提高和价格的急剧下降,还导致了大规模的过时和产能过剩。19世纪90年代的大规模并购浪潮将1800家公司合并为150家左右,从而降低了产能,而20世纪80年代的杠杆收购、杠杆收购和其他杠杆资本重组为美国经济许多部门的产能过剩提供了“健康的调整”。为了帮助上市公司对产能过剩进行必要的调整,作者敦促他们考虑采用私募股权的一些特征,包括管理人员的大量股权,高杠杆或支付,以及招募活跃的投资者作为“业务合作伙伴”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信