LECTURER PRACTICES ON CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ WRITING ACCURACY (A Descriptive Study to the 3rd Semester Students Of English Study Program At IKIP PGRI Pontianak)

Vidia Apriani, I. Ikhsanudin, Clarry Sada
{"title":"LECTURER PRACTICES ON CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ WRITING ACCURACY (A Descriptive Study to the 3rd Semester Students Of English Study Program At IKIP PGRI Pontianak)","authors":"Vidia Apriani, I. Ikhsanudin, Clarry Sada","doi":"10.38114/JOEEL.V2I1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Corrective Feedback has been the center of attention among language researchers and education experts. The purpose of this study is to find out the types of Corrective Feedback that the lecturer used to correcting the students’ writing errors. This study was designed in qualitative form. In this study, the participants were two English lecturers and the third-year semester students. These participants were interviewed about their preference of corrective feedback and how they applied corrective feedback in the teaching of writing in their class. In order to obtain the data, the researcher used interview and document analysis. To enrich the findings in this study, the researcher collected the answer sheets from 26 students in two interval periods. The results of the study revealed that grammar was the most corrected elements in writing, with the percentage of 49.25%, followed by vocabulary by 22.39% and organization and mechanic by 19.40% and 8.96%. These figures were consistent with the interview results where the lecturers stated that grammar is their focus for corrective feedback. This study also revealed that corrective feedback is something that the students expected from their lecturers.","PeriodicalId":120959,"journal":{"name":"JOEEL: Journal of English Education and Literature","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOEEL: Journal of English Education and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38114/JOEEL.V2I1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Corrective Feedback has been the center of attention among language researchers and education experts. The purpose of this study is to find out the types of Corrective Feedback that the lecturer used to correcting the students’ writing errors. This study was designed in qualitative form. In this study, the participants were two English lecturers and the third-year semester students. These participants were interviewed about their preference of corrective feedback and how they applied corrective feedback in the teaching of writing in their class. In order to obtain the data, the researcher used interview and document analysis. To enrich the findings in this study, the researcher collected the answer sheets from 26 students in two interval periods. The results of the study revealed that grammar was the most corrected elements in writing, with the percentage of 49.25%, followed by vocabulary by 22.39% and organization and mechanic by 19.40% and 8.96%. These figures were consistent with the interview results where the lecturers stated that grammar is their focus for corrective feedback. This study also revealed that corrective feedback is something that the students expected from their lecturers.
讲师纠正反馈在提高学生写作准确性中的实践(对我校第三学期英语学习项目学生的描述性研究)
摘要:矫正反馈一直是语言研究者和教育专家关注的焦点。本研究的目的是找出讲师用来纠正学生写作错误的纠正反馈的类型。本研究采用定性设计。本研究以两名英语讲师和三年级学生为研究对象。这些参与者接受了关于他们对纠正反馈的偏好以及他们如何在课堂写作教学中应用纠正反馈的采访。为了获得数据,研究者采用了访谈法和文献分析法。为了丰富本研究的发现,研究者在两个间隔期间收集了26名学生的答卷。研究结果表明,语法是写作中错误最多的因素,占49.25%,其次是词汇,占22.39%,组织和机械分别占19.40%和8.96%。这些数字与访谈结果一致,讲师表示语法是他们纠正反馈的重点。本研究还发现,学生期望从老师那里得到纠正性反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信