Barriers to the use of Low GWP Refrigerants in the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector in Mauritius

R. Dreepaul, K. Elahee
{"title":"Barriers to the use of Low GWP Refrigerants in the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector in Mauritius","authors":"R. Dreepaul, K. Elahee","doi":"10.1109/EFEA.2018.8617096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with the issue of phasing out of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in Mauritius following the Kigali amendments of the Montreal protocol. For this purpose, a gap analysis was carried out among the major stakeholders in the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning (RAC) sector in Mauritius concerning the introduction of environment friendly refrigerants. Based on the gap analysis, it was found that the most frequently used refrigerants in the sector were HFCs and, to a lesser extent, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC). However, because of their negative influence on the environment, natural refrigerants such as ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2) and Hydrocarbons (HC), having minimal impact on the environment, are being considered. On the other hand, HFOs, a new family of synthetic refrigerants also having low GWP have just appeared on the market. While these refrigerants have several advantages in terms of energy savings and thermodynamic efficiency, they also presents some drawbacks related namely to safety and availability on the market. In this paper, we discussed the major gaps in the implementation of these aforementioned new alternatives (i.e. NH3, CO2, HC and HFOs). Additionally, we proposed some solutions to cater for these gaps. Finally, some conclusions are drawn on future possible policy and decision making with regards to the implementation of the above technology.","PeriodicalId":447143,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EFEA.2018.8617096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the issue of phasing out of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in Mauritius following the Kigali amendments of the Montreal protocol. For this purpose, a gap analysis was carried out among the major stakeholders in the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning (RAC) sector in Mauritius concerning the introduction of environment friendly refrigerants. Based on the gap analysis, it was found that the most frequently used refrigerants in the sector were HFCs and, to a lesser extent, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC). However, because of their negative influence on the environment, natural refrigerants such as ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2) and Hydrocarbons (HC), having minimal impact on the environment, are being considered. On the other hand, HFOs, a new family of synthetic refrigerants also having low GWP have just appeared on the market. While these refrigerants have several advantages in terms of energy savings and thermodynamic efficiency, they also presents some drawbacks related namely to safety and availability on the market. In this paper, we discussed the major gaps in the implementation of these aforementioned new alternatives (i.e. NH3, CO2, HC and HFOs). Additionally, we proposed some solutions to cater for these gaps. Finally, some conclusions are drawn on future possible policy and decision making with regards to the implementation of the above technology.
毛里求斯制冷和空调行业使用低全球升温潜能值制冷剂的障碍
本文涉及《蒙特利尔议定书》基加利修正案之后毛里求斯逐步淘汰氢氟碳化物的问题。为此目的,在毛里求斯制冷和空调部门的主要利益攸关方之间就采用环境友好型制冷剂进行了差距分析。根据差距分析,该部门最常用的制冷剂是氢氟碳化物,其次是氟氯烃(HCFC)。然而,由于对环境的负面影响,正在考虑使用对环境影响最小的天然制冷剂,如氨(NH3)、二氧化碳(CO2)和碳氢化合物(HC)。另一方面,hfo,一种同样具有低GWP值的新型合成制冷剂刚刚出现在市场上。虽然这些制冷剂在节能和热力学效率方面具有一些优点,但它们也存在一些缺点,即与市场上的安全性和可用性有关。在本文中,我们讨论了上述新替代品(即NH3, CO2, HC和hfo)在实施中的主要差距。此外,我们提出了一些解决方案来满足这些差距。最后,针对上述技术的实施,对未来可能的政策和决策进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信