Elite Solidarity, Social Responsibility, and the Contested Origins of Britain’s First Business Schools

M. Maclean, C. Harvey, T. McGovern, G. Shaw
{"title":"Elite Solidarity, Social Responsibility, and the Contested Origins of Britain’s First Business Schools","authors":"M. Maclean, C. Harvey, T. McGovern, G. Shaw","doi":"10.5465/amle.2021.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Britain is often depicted as a laggard in management education before the late creation of two graduate business schools in London and Manchester in the mid-1960s triggered the emergence of a new academic sector. According to the dominant narrative, the anachronistic views of Britain’s industrial leaders and disdain of its universities for practical learning constrained developments in the field. Through the lens of elite theory, we offer a reinterpretation of the formation of Britain’s first business schools informed by archival research, suggesting that they arose from an evolutionary process rather than a crucible event. The story of the creation of Britain’s first business schools has never been told from the perspective of elite agency. Our study reveals the emergent managerial elite of the post-war era growing into something altogether more powerful. Our main contribution to theory is to demonstrate that, while expanding management education ostensibly contravened elite interests, elite interaction in the field of power at a time of national urgency amplified elite influence, prefiguring their role as ‘influence elites’ today.","PeriodicalId":343948,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Learning & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Britain is often depicted as a laggard in management education before the late creation of two graduate business schools in London and Manchester in the mid-1960s triggered the emergence of a new academic sector. According to the dominant narrative, the anachronistic views of Britain’s industrial leaders and disdain of its universities for practical learning constrained developments in the field. Through the lens of elite theory, we offer a reinterpretation of the formation of Britain’s first business schools informed by archival research, suggesting that they arose from an evolutionary process rather than a crucible event. The story of the creation of Britain’s first business schools has never been told from the perspective of elite agency. Our study reveals the emergent managerial elite of the post-war era growing into something altogether more powerful. Our main contribution to theory is to demonstrate that, while expanding management education ostensibly contravened elite interests, elite interaction in the field of power at a time of national urgency amplified elite influence, prefiguring their role as ‘influence elites’ today.
精英团结、社会责任和英国首批商学院的争议起源
上世纪60年代中期,英国在伦敦和曼彻斯特相继成立了两所研究生商学院,引发了一个新的学术领域的出现。在此之前,英国经常被描述为管理教育的落后者。根据主流叙事,英国工业领袖的过时观点和对大学实践学习的蔑视限制了该领域的发展。通过精英理论的视角,我们通过档案研究对英国首批商学院的形成进行了重新解读,表明它们起源于一个进化过程,而不是一个严峻的事件。从来没有人从精英机构的角度来讲述英国首批商学院的创建过程。我们的研究表明,战后时代涌现的管理精英正在成长为更强大的群体。我们对理论的主要贡献是证明,虽然扩大管理教育表面上违背了精英的利益,但在国家紧急时期,精英在权力领域的互动放大了精英的影响力,预示了他们今天作为“影响力精英”的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信