Analysis of sCO2 Waste Heat Recovery System for Application in a Cement Plant

L. Vesely, S. Macadam, J. Kapat, G. Subbaraman
{"title":"Analysis of sCO2 Waste Heat Recovery System for Application in a Cement Plant","authors":"L. Vesely, S. Macadam, J. Kapat, G. Subbaraman","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-83440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The industrial sector contributes approximately 28% of global CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions from energy-intensive industries can be reduced by converting waste heat into electricity. This represents a low-cost, zero-emissions power generation option with near-term deployment opportunities. One energy-intensive industry is cement production. Two cement plant heat sources are flue gas streams from preheater and clinker cooler, with temperatures of 250–450 °C. Potential energy conversion systems include Organic Rankine (ORC), steam Rankine (SRC), and supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles. ORC/SRCs have been commercially deployed in cement plants. However, sCO2 power cycles offer benefits such as high thermal stability of CO2, higher cycle efficiencies, and compact power generation equipment. The paper is focused on multi-objective optimization of four sCO2 cycle layouts (Recuperated, Re-compression, Partial recuperative, and cascade) and comparison with ORCs/SRCs. The optimization considers waste heat temperatures of > 300°C. The results show that sCO2 power cycles can reach cycle efficiencies up to 30 %, which is higher than corresponding ORCs and almost similar to SRCs. However, cycle efficiency is not the only parameter to evaluate waste heat utilization. More meaningful parameters are the net power and capital costs. Results show higher power outputs from the sCO2 cycle compared to ORCs and SRC.","PeriodicalId":105703,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Supercritical CO2","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Supercritical CO2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-83440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The industrial sector contributes approximately 28% of global CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions from energy-intensive industries can be reduced by converting waste heat into electricity. This represents a low-cost, zero-emissions power generation option with near-term deployment opportunities. One energy-intensive industry is cement production. Two cement plant heat sources are flue gas streams from preheater and clinker cooler, with temperatures of 250–450 °C. Potential energy conversion systems include Organic Rankine (ORC), steam Rankine (SRC), and supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles. ORC/SRCs have been commercially deployed in cement plants. However, sCO2 power cycles offer benefits such as high thermal stability of CO2, higher cycle efficiencies, and compact power generation equipment. The paper is focused on multi-objective optimization of four sCO2 cycle layouts (Recuperated, Re-compression, Partial recuperative, and cascade) and comparison with ORCs/SRCs. The optimization considers waste heat temperatures of > 300°C. The results show that sCO2 power cycles can reach cycle efficiencies up to 30 %, which is higher than corresponding ORCs and almost similar to SRCs. However, cycle efficiency is not the only parameter to evaluate waste heat utilization. More meaningful parameters are the net power and capital costs. Results show higher power outputs from the sCO2 cycle compared to ORCs and SRC.
某水泥厂sCO2余热回收系统应用分析
工业部门约占全球二氧化碳排放量的28%。能源密集型工业的二氧化碳排放可以通过将废热转化为电能来减少。这是一种低成本、零排放的发电选择,具有近期部署的机会。一个能源密集型产业是水泥生产。两个水泥厂热源是来自预热器和熟料冷却器的烟气流,温度为250-450°C。势能转换系统包括有机朗肯(ORC)、蒸汽朗肯(SRC)和超临界CO2 (sCO2)动力循环。ORC/ src已在水泥厂进行商业应用。然而,sCO2电力循环提供了诸如CO2的高热稳定性,更高的循环效率和紧凑的发电设备等优点。本文重点研究了四种sCO2循环布局(休整、再压缩、部分休整和级联)的多目标优化,并与ORCs/ src进行了比较。该优化考虑了余热温度> 300℃。结果表明,sCO2功率循环可以达到高达30%的循环效率,高于相应的ORCs,几乎与src相似。然而,循环效率并不是评价余热利用的唯一参数。更有意义的参数是净功率和资本成本。结果表明,与ORCs和SRC相比,sCO2循环的功率输出更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信