COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FRENCH AND GERMAN PRIORITIES IN THE ELABORATION OF PESCO

P. Timofeev
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FRENCH AND GERMAN PRIORITIES IN THE ELABORATION OF PESCO","authors":"P. Timofeev","doi":"10.20542/afij-2019-2-33-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the French and German approaches towards Permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) – a new EU defense initiative launched in 2017. The author shows PESCO as well as European integration became a result of the compromises of European states, led by both France and Germany. Following brief history of PESCO, the author compares two approaches towards PESCO objectives, content, concrete practical projects and correlation between PESCO and NATO. The author highlights common points in the positions of Paris and Berlin: their goal – strengthening the military-political potential of the EU in the world; their willingness to work together on specific and prospective projects (including modernization of combat helicopters and the creation of flying eurodrones) and understanding of PESCO as not an alternative for NATO. In the same time the author shows the specifics and the differences of both approaches, based on geography, economy and pragmatism, law and military traditions, competition for EU leadership. Dominating German approach is “inclusive” and more cautious: it aims at the progressive development of European integration in the military area, which, through joint political and economic efforts of all EU member states, should lead to a common defense policy. French approach being more “ambitious” aims at shaping a group of states led by France, capable of conducting interventions - thus solving offensive tasks. Two different philosophies determine distinct views on concrete projects: France is more proactive than Germany and shows a greater interest in projects related to the direct conduct of hostilities. Berlin is seeking to focus on more “technical” cases. Finally, Paris and Berlin see the PESCO relationship with NATO in different ways: PESCO is seen in Germany as an addition to the Alliance, while France avoids comparing both structures, perhaps planning to give PESCO more ambitious scope in the future. The author concludes the French-German cooperation in the work on PESCO looks promising and can strengthen EU defense convergence. At the same time, the article shows objective limitations that could stop or completely disrupt this project. About author: Pavel P. TIMOFEEV, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Senior Researcher, Sector of Regional Issues and Conflicts, Department of European Political Studies.","PeriodicalId":405984,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-2-33-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article focuses on the French and German approaches towards Permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) – a new EU defense initiative launched in 2017. The author shows PESCO as well as European integration became a result of the compromises of European states, led by both France and Germany. Following brief history of PESCO, the author compares two approaches towards PESCO objectives, content, concrete practical projects and correlation between PESCO and NATO. The author highlights common points in the positions of Paris and Berlin: their goal – strengthening the military-political potential of the EU in the world; their willingness to work together on specific and prospective projects (including modernization of combat helicopters and the creation of flying eurodrones) and understanding of PESCO as not an alternative for NATO. In the same time the author shows the specifics and the differences of both approaches, based on geography, economy and pragmatism, law and military traditions, competition for EU leadership. Dominating German approach is “inclusive” and more cautious: it aims at the progressive development of European integration in the military area, which, through joint political and economic efforts of all EU member states, should lead to a common defense policy. French approach being more “ambitious” aims at shaping a group of states led by France, capable of conducting interventions - thus solving offensive tasks. Two different philosophies determine distinct views on concrete projects: France is more proactive than Germany and shows a greater interest in projects related to the direct conduct of hostilities. Berlin is seeking to focus on more “technical” cases. Finally, Paris and Berlin see the PESCO relationship with NATO in different ways: PESCO is seen in Germany as an addition to the Alliance, while France avoids comparing both structures, perhaps planning to give PESCO more ambitious scope in the future. The author concludes the French-German cooperation in the work on PESCO looks promising and can strengthen EU defense convergence. At the same time, the article shows objective limitations that could stop or completely disrupt this project. About author: Pavel P. TIMOFEEV, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Senior Researcher, Sector of Regional Issues and Conflicts, Department of European Political Studies.
法德两国在制定pesco时优先事项的比较分析
本文重点介绍了法国和德国对永久结构性合作(PESCO)的态度——这是2017年启动的一项新的欧盟防务倡议。作者认为,PESCO和欧洲一体化都是以法国和德国为首的欧洲国家妥协的结果。在简要介绍PESCO的历史之后,作者比较了PESCO的目标、内容、具体实践项目以及PESCO与北约的关系的两种途径。作者强调了巴黎和柏林立场的共同点:他们的目标是加强欧盟在世界上的军事政治潜力;他们愿意在具体和未来的项目上合作(包括战斗直升机的现代化和飞行的欧洲无人机的创造),并理解PESCO不是北约的替代品。同时,作者从地理、经济与实用主义、法律与军事传统、欧盟领导权竞争的角度,展示了两种方法的具体特点和差异。德国的主导方式是“包容的”,更谨慎:它旨在逐步发展欧洲在军事领域的一体化,通过所有欧盟成员国的政治和经济共同努力,应该导致共同的防务政策。法国的做法更加“雄心勃勃”,旨在塑造一个由法国领导的国家集团,有能力进行干预——从而解决进攻性任务。两种不同的理念决定了对具体项目的不同看法:法国比德国更积极主动,对与直接进行敌对行动有关的项目表现出更大的兴趣。柏林方面正寻求将重点放在更“技术性”的案例上。最后,巴黎和柏林以不同的方式看待PESCO与北约的关系:PESCO在德国被视为联盟的补充,而法国避免比较这两个结构,也许计划在未来给予PESCO更雄心勃勃的范围。作者认为,法德在PESCO工作中的合作前景广阔,可以加强欧盟的防务融合。同时,文章指出了可能阻止或彻底破坏这个项目的客观限制。作者简介:Pavel P. TIMOFEEV,美国。科学。(政治学),欧洲政治研究学院区域问题和冲突部高级研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信