Dialogue with The Master: Early Shī‘a Encounters with Akbarīan Mysticism

L. Chamankhah
{"title":"Dialogue with The Master: Early Shī‘a Encounters with Akbarīan Mysticism","authors":"L. Chamankhah","doi":"10.15642/teosofi.2020.10.1.155-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muḥy al-Dīn Ibn ‘Arabī’s theoretical mysticism has been the subject of lively discussion among Iranian Sufis since they first encountered it in the seventh century. ‘Abdul Razzāq Kāshānī was the pioneer and forerunner of the debate, followed by reading and interpreting al-Shaykh al-Akbar’s key texts, particularly Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Bezels of Wisdom) by future generations of Shī‘ī scholars. Along with commentaries and glosses on his works, every element of ibn ‘Arabī’s mysticism, from his theory of the oneness of existence (waḥdat al-wujūd) to his doctrines of nubuwwa, wilāya, and khatm al-wilāya, was accepted by his Shī‘ī peers, incorporated into their context and adjusted to Shī‘a doctrinal platform. This process of internalization and amalgamation was so complete that after seven centuries, it is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish between Ibn ‘Arabī’s theory of waḥdat al-wujūd, or his doctrines of wilāya and khatm al-wilāya and those of his Shī‘ī readers. To have a clearer picture of the philosophical and mystical activities and interests of Shī‘ī scholars in Iran under Ilkhanids (1256-1353), I examined the intellectual and historical contexts of seventh century Iran. The findings of my research are indicative of the contribution of mystics such as ‘Abdul Razzāq Kāshānī to both the school of Ibn ‘Arabī in general and of Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī in particular on the one hand, and to the correlation between Sufism and Shī‘īsm on the other. What I call the ‘Shī‘ītization of Akbarīan Mysticism’ started with Kāshānī and can be regarded as a new chapter in the history of Iranian Sufism.","PeriodicalId":174700,"journal":{"name":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2020.10.1.155-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Muḥy al-Dīn Ibn ‘Arabī’s theoretical mysticism has been the subject of lively discussion among Iranian Sufis since they first encountered it in the seventh century. ‘Abdul Razzāq Kāshānī was the pioneer and forerunner of the debate, followed by reading and interpreting al-Shaykh al-Akbar’s key texts, particularly Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Bezels of Wisdom) by future generations of Shī‘ī scholars. Along with commentaries and glosses on his works, every element of ibn ‘Arabī’s mysticism, from his theory of the oneness of existence (waḥdat al-wujūd) to his doctrines of nubuwwa, wilāya, and khatm al-wilāya, was accepted by his Shī‘ī peers, incorporated into their context and adjusted to Shī‘a doctrinal platform. This process of internalization and amalgamation was so complete that after seven centuries, it is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish between Ibn ‘Arabī’s theory of waḥdat al-wujūd, or his doctrines of wilāya and khatm al-wilāya and those of his Shī‘ī readers. To have a clearer picture of the philosophical and mystical activities and interests of Shī‘ī scholars in Iran under Ilkhanids (1256-1353), I examined the intellectual and historical contexts of seventh century Iran. The findings of my research are indicative of the contribution of mystics such as ‘Abdul Razzāq Kāshānī to both the school of Ibn ‘Arabī in general and of Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī in particular on the one hand, and to the correlation between Sufism and Shī‘īsm on the other. What I call the ‘Shī‘ītization of Akbarīan Mysticism’ started with Kāshānī and can be regarded as a new chapter in the history of Iranian Sufism.
与大师的对话:早期什阿与阿克巴神秘主义的相遇
Muḥy al- d n伊本阿拉伯的理论神秘主义一直是伊朗苏菲派之间热烈讨论的主题,因为他们第一次遇到它在七世纪。阿卜杜勒Razzāq Kāshānī是这场辩论的先驱和先驱,随后是阅读和解释谢赫阿克巴尔的关键文本,特别是Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam(智慧的Bezels),由未来几代什伊学者撰写。随着对他的著作的注释和注解,伊本·阿拉伯的神秘主义的每一个元素,从他的存在的一体性理论(waḥdat al-wujūd)到他的nubuwwa, wilāya和khatm al-wilāya的教义,都被他的shi ' s同行所接受,并被纳入他们的背景中,并调整为shi ' s的教义平台。这一内化和融合的过程是如此彻底,以至于在七个世纪之后,即使不是不可能,也很难将伊本·阿拉伯的waḥdat al-wujūd理论,或者他的wilāya和khatm al-wilāya学说,与他的shi ' s读者的理论区分开来。为了更清楚地了解伊尔汗(1256-1353)统治时期伊朗shi ' s学者的哲学和神秘活动和兴趣,我研究了七世纪伊朗的知识和历史背景。我的研究结果表明,神秘主义者,如' Abdul Razzāq Kāshānī,一方面对伊本·阿拉伯学派的总体贡献,特别是对Ṣadr al- d - n al-Qūnawī的贡献,另一方面对苏非主义和什叶派之间的关系的贡献。我所说的akbaran神秘主义的“shi”化始于Kāshānī,可以被视为伊朗苏菲主义历史上的新篇章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信