An Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Detection of Myocardial Infarction Using Wavelet Entropy and Eigenspace Features

Pharvesh Salman Choudhary, S. Dandapat
{"title":"An Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Detection of Myocardial Infarction Using Wavelet Entropy and Eigenspace Features","authors":"Pharvesh Salman Choudhary, S. Dandapat","doi":"10.1109/ASPCON49795.2020.9276680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the utility of several machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting Myocardial infarction (MI) from multi-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Wavelet-based features are used for the evaluation, as wavelet decomposition of ECG segregates clinical components into different subbands. The pathological changes are reflected in these sub-bands and are captured by wavelet entropy and eigenspace based features. The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) diagnostic database consisting of healthy and different types of MI is used for evaluation. The results show that the K-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithm with the nearest neighbour set to six obtained the best result among the ML classifiers with F1-score of 0.97 and 0.94 for MI detection and localization respectively. The performance of the support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis function (RBF) kernel obtained an F1-score of 0.96 and 0.92 for detection and localization respectively. The results obtained using classical ML classifiers were also compared with the performance of 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN).","PeriodicalId":193814,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Applied Signal Processing Conference (ASPCON)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Applied Signal Processing Conference (ASPCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPCON49795.2020.9276680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to compare the utility of several machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting Myocardial infarction (MI) from multi-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Wavelet-based features are used for the evaluation, as wavelet decomposition of ECG segregates clinical components into different subbands. The pathological changes are reflected in these sub-bands and are captured by wavelet entropy and eigenspace based features. The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) diagnostic database consisting of healthy and different types of MI is used for evaluation. The results show that the K-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithm with the nearest neighbour set to six obtained the best result among the ML classifiers with F1-score of 0.97 and 0.94 for MI detection and localization respectively. The performance of the support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis function (RBF) kernel obtained an F1-score of 0.96 and 0.92 for detection and localization respectively. The results obtained using classical ML classifiers were also compared with the performance of 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN).
基于小波熵和特征空间特征的心肌梗死机器学习分类器评价
本研究旨在比较几种机器学习(ML)算法在从多导联心电图(ECG)预测心肌梗死(MI)方面的效用。基于小波的特征用于评估,因为ECG的小波分解将临床分量分离到不同的子带中。病理变化反映在这些子带中,并由小波熵和基于特征空间的特征捕获。使用由健康和不同类型心肌梗死组成的德国物理技术诊断数据库进行评估。结果表明,最近邻设置为6的k近邻(KNN)算法在MI检测和定位方面的f1得分分别为0.97和0.94,在ML分类器中获得了最好的结果。基于径向基函数(RBF)核的支持向量机(SVM)检测和定位的f1得分分别为0.96和0.92。使用经典ML分类器获得的结果也与一维卷积神经网络(CNN)的性能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信