The history of the Memorial Museum Perm–36: the experience of historiographical comprehension and museumification

Sergei A. Shevyrin
{"title":"The history of the Memorial Museum Perm–36: the experience of historiographical comprehension and museumification","authors":"Sergei A. Shevyrin","doi":"10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-4-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies the history of a small timber-harvesting colony that was created in the times of the GULAG labor camps, outlived the period of being a political colony, and was transformed into a museum, the Museum of the History of Political Repression Perm–36, in the 1990s. Based on the analysis of publications of the 1990s–2000s, an attempt was made to recreate the history of comprehension of the era of political repression using the example of a certain museum. From the active study of the topic in the early 1990s and establishment of a public museum with support from the Perm Oblast administration, Perm–36 moved on to undergo severe criticism from the local and federal press, deprivation of financing and administrative support and, finally, rather rough dismissal of the museum administration and appointment of top managers from the Ministry of Culture. The public museum had a powerful creative and scientific potential that allowed it to develop, implement new forms of work, and attract the international museum and human rights community, but, unfortunately, the State Memorial Museum of the History of Political Repression Perm–36 has become an ordinary regional museum in fact. In the first years of being a state museum (2015–16), the administration of Perm-36 tried to revise the directions of work of the public museum. This was expressed in its attempts to justify the authorities and the cruel laws of the time when the colony existed and to find some incriminating evidence against its political prisoners. New exhibitions of the museum (e.g. “Broken by windfalls”) highlighted the state’s need for the prisoners’ work, in particular in harvesting timber needed for the reconstruction of war-ravaged cities, the successes in mechanization of camp production, and so on. The public outcry forced the leadership of the museum to adjust its course. Now, according to the development concept adopted in 2019, the activities of the reserve museum are aimed at preserving the memory of victims of political repression in order to prevent such tragedies in the future. The state museum Perm–36 continues to open new exhibitions and expositions that tell the story of the colony through the stories of people from the GULAG camps, dissidents, and human rights activists. However, the activities of the state memorial museum, which is deprived of public initiative and creative potential of the first directors, cannot yet rise to the level of international recognition and significance that its predecessor, the public museum, used to have.","PeriodicalId":250882,"journal":{"name":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-4-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article studies the history of a small timber-harvesting colony that was created in the times of the GULAG labor camps, outlived the period of being a political colony, and was transformed into a museum, the Museum of the History of Political Repression Perm–36, in the 1990s. Based on the analysis of publications of the 1990s–2000s, an attempt was made to recreate the history of comprehension of the era of political repression using the example of a certain museum. From the active study of the topic in the early 1990s and establishment of a public museum with support from the Perm Oblast administration, Perm–36 moved on to undergo severe criticism from the local and federal press, deprivation of financing and administrative support and, finally, rather rough dismissal of the museum administration and appointment of top managers from the Ministry of Culture. The public museum had a powerful creative and scientific potential that allowed it to develop, implement new forms of work, and attract the international museum and human rights community, but, unfortunately, the State Memorial Museum of the History of Political Repression Perm–36 has become an ordinary regional museum in fact. In the first years of being a state museum (2015–16), the administration of Perm-36 tried to revise the directions of work of the public museum. This was expressed in its attempts to justify the authorities and the cruel laws of the time when the colony existed and to find some incriminating evidence against its political prisoners. New exhibitions of the museum (e.g. “Broken by windfalls”) highlighted the state’s need for the prisoners’ work, in particular in harvesting timber needed for the reconstruction of war-ravaged cities, the successes in mechanization of camp production, and so on. The public outcry forced the leadership of the museum to adjust its course. Now, according to the development concept adopted in 2019, the activities of the reserve museum are aimed at preserving the memory of victims of political repression in order to prevent such tragedies in the future. The state museum Perm–36 continues to open new exhibitions and expositions that tell the story of the colony through the stories of people from the GULAG camps, dissidents, and human rights activists. However, the activities of the state memorial museum, which is deprived of public initiative and creative potential of the first directors, cannot yet rise to the level of international recognition and significance that its predecessor, the public museum, used to have.
纪念博物馆Perm-36的历史:史学理解和博物馆化的经验
这篇文章研究了古拉格(GULAG)劳改时期建立的一个小型木材采伐殖民地的历史,它在作为政治殖民地的时期结束后,于20世纪90年代被改造成一个博物馆,即政治镇压历史博物馆(museum of The history of political Repression)。以1990 ~ 2000年代的出版物为基础,以某博物馆为例,试图再现对政治压迫时代的理解史。从20世纪90年代初对该主题的积极研究和在彼尔姆州政府的支持下建立公共博物馆开始,彼尔姆- 36经历了来自地方和联邦媒体的严厉批评,资金和行政支持被剥夺,最后,博物馆管理部门被相当粗暴地解雇,最高管理人员被文化部任命。公共博物馆具有强大的创造性和科学潜力,使其能够发展,实施新的工作形式,并吸引国际博物馆和人权社区,但不幸的是,政治镇压历史国家纪念博物馆实际上已成为一个普通的地区博物馆。在成为国家博物馆的最初几年(2015-16),彼尔姆-36的管理层试图修改公共博物馆的工作方向。这表现在它试图为殖民地存在时的当局和残酷的法律辩护,并找到一些对其政治犯有罪的证据。博物馆的新展览(如“意外之财”)突出了国家对囚犯工作的需求,特别是在为重建被战争蹂躏的城市而采伐木材方面,以及在集中营生产机械化方面取得的成功,等等。公众的强烈抗议迫使博物馆的领导层调整路线。现在,根据2019年通过的发展理念,保护区博物馆的活动旨在保存政治镇压受害者的记忆,以防止未来发生此类悲剧。国立博物馆彼尔姆- 36继续举办新的展览和展览,通过古拉格集中营、持不同政见者和人权活动家的故事讲述殖民地的故事。然而,国家纪念博物馆的活动被剥夺了公众的主动性和第一任馆长的创造潜力,还不能上升到其前身公共博物馆曾经拥有的国际认可和意义的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信