D-S quantification of aleatory uncertainty based on error assessment of intervals' endpoints

Sheng-yong Hu
{"title":"D-S quantification of aleatory uncertainty based on error assessment of intervals' endpoints","authors":"Sheng-yong Hu","doi":"10.1109/PHM.2016.7819804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of coexistence of aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty in engineering design, we represented a method of unifying aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty, and that is to quantifying probability uncertainty for structures of evidence theory (D-S theory), thereafter this method will provide theory foundation for uncertainty quantification of complex machinery. Probability density function (PDF) is a token for aleatory uncertainty usually, and it expresses normal distribution. According to evidence theory, the equal interval is adopted to disperse the PDFs. Based on the analyzing the error of dispersed function and divided intervals, the endpoints' error of a single interval between the PDF and interval are set up for the principles, and we represent three principles. Lastly, the PDFs are quantified as D-S structure by using these methods, and the quantification results show principle I reflects the distribution better during similarly acceptable error, and quantification results will express the real distribution of PDFs much better while the acceptable error is smaller.","PeriodicalId":202597,"journal":{"name":"2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2016.7819804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of coexistence of aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty in engineering design, we represented a method of unifying aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty, and that is to quantifying probability uncertainty for structures of evidence theory (D-S theory), thereafter this method will provide theory foundation for uncertainty quantification of complex machinery. Probability density function (PDF) is a token for aleatory uncertainty usually, and it expresses normal distribution. According to evidence theory, the equal interval is adopted to disperse the PDFs. Based on the analyzing the error of dispersed function and divided intervals, the endpoints' error of a single interval between the PDF and interval are set up for the principles, and we represent three principles. Lastly, the PDFs are quantified as D-S structure by using these methods, and the quantification results show principle I reflects the distribution better during similarly acceptable error, and quantification results will express the real distribution of PDFs much better while the acceptable error is smaller.
基于区间端点误差评估的测定不确定性的D-S量化
针对工程设计中偶然性不确定性和认识性不确定性并存的问题,提出了一种将偶然性不确定性和认识性不确定性统一起来的方法,即对证据理论结构(D-S理论)的概率不确定性进行量化,为复杂机械的不确定性量化提供理论基础。概率密度函数(PDF)通常是随机不确定性的表征,它表示正态分布。根据证据理论,采用等间隔来分散pdf。在分析离散函数误差和分割区间误差的基础上,建立了各原理在PDF和区间之间的单个区间端点误差,并给出了三种原理。最后,利用这些方法将pdf量化为D-S结构,量化结果显示,在可接受误差相似的情况下,原理1更能反映pdf的分布,在可接受误差较小的情况下,量化结果更能表达pdf的真实分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信