Application of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) Statement Guideline in Nursing Studies: Analytical Review

Ahmed Lateef Alkhaqani
{"title":"Application of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) Statement Guideline in Nursing Studies: Analytical Review","authors":"Ahmed Lateef Alkhaqani","doi":"10.54133/ajms.v2i.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were created to aid the author in ensuring a high-quality presentation of the conducted observational study. Objective: Applying the STROBE statement guideline checklist to evaluate the quality of nursing studies and observational reporting. Methods: Analytical review of literature based on previous studies and reviews derived from Scopus, PubMed, and Medline databases concerning STROBE statement guidelines. The data collection was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021. These studies were collected and filtered according to the specific criteria and used keywords such as STROBE, nursing studies, evidence-based nursing practice, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional and observational studies, as well as articles from the National Library of Medicine. Results: Few papers have been published that demonstrate an appreciation of STROBE, but their descriptive features do not seem appropriate for nursing publications. In comparison to STROBE, relatively few papers mentioned primary sources or other information regarding the selection process for study participants and the observation time frame. Conclusion: Despite the widespread availability of reporting guidelines in both medical and nursing fields, many researchers do not follow them.","PeriodicalId":433524,"journal":{"name":"Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN: 2789-3219 )","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN: 2789-3219 )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v2i.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were created to aid the author in ensuring a high-quality presentation of the conducted observational study. Objective: Applying the STROBE statement guideline checklist to evaluate the quality of nursing studies and observational reporting. Methods: Analytical review of literature based on previous studies and reviews derived from Scopus, PubMed, and Medline databases concerning STROBE statement guidelines. The data collection was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021. These studies were collected and filtered according to the specific criteria and used keywords such as STROBE, nursing studies, evidence-based nursing practice, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional and observational studies, as well as articles from the National Library of Medicine. Results: Few papers have been published that demonstrate an appreciation of STROBE, but their descriptive features do not seem appropriate for nursing publications. In comparison to STROBE, relatively few papers mentioned primary sources or other information regarding the selection process for study participants and the observation time frame. Conclusion: Despite the widespread availability of reporting guidelines in both medical and nursing fields, many researchers do not follow them.
加强观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明指南在护理研究中的应用:分析综述
背景:加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南的创建是为了帮助作者确保所进行的观察性研究的高质量报告。目的:应用STROBE陈述指南检查表评价护理研究和观察报告的质量。方法:基于Scopus、PubMed和Medline数据库中有关STROBE声明指南的既往研究和综述,对文献进行分析性综述。数据收集于2020年12月至2021年4月进行。这些研究是根据特定的标准收集和筛选的,使用的关键词有:STROBE、护理研究、循证护理实践、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面和观察性研究,以及来自美国国家医学图书馆的文章。结果:很少有论文发表,表明赞赏频闪,但他们的描述特征似乎不适合护理出版物。与STROBE相比,相对较少的论文提到了关于研究参与者选择过程和观察时间框架的主要来源或其他信息。结论:尽管在医学和护理领域广泛使用报告指南,但许多研究人员并没有遵循它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信