Strategic Use of Zero-rating of Mobile Data

Bronwyn E. Howell, Roslyn Layton
{"title":"Strategic Use of Zero-rating of Mobile Data","authors":"Bronwyn E. Howell, Roslyn Layton","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.84130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital economy, characterised by goods exhibiting high instantiation and low reproduction costs frequently created and distributed over multisided platforms, poses challenges for the pricing of products and services. As convergence occurs between applications and transport, flexible ways of pricing internet access and content are being developed. One frequently used pricing strategy is 'zero-rating'--where traffic for specific applications is not counted against the 'cap' in an internet user's monthly access plan. This pricing strategy has drawn much criticism from net neutrality advocates, but it is far from clear that the policy is harmful. Using an economic analysis based upon relaxing assumptions in the simple model of perfect competition, so that it more closely reflects the complex internet ecosystem, we assess the extent to which it is plausible for zero-rating to be used to harm competition, consumer welfare and incentives for application innovation. We develop five questions to assist inquiry into the potential harm or benefits arising, which can be applied by competition authorities, regulators and the firms concerned to assist in sorting the cases less likely to be harmful from those that warrant further investigation.","PeriodicalId":134351,"journal":{"name":"Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.84130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The digital economy, characterised by goods exhibiting high instantiation and low reproduction costs frequently created and distributed over multisided platforms, poses challenges for the pricing of products and services. As convergence occurs between applications and transport, flexible ways of pricing internet access and content are being developed. One frequently used pricing strategy is 'zero-rating'--where traffic for specific applications is not counted against the 'cap' in an internet user's monthly access plan. This pricing strategy has drawn much criticism from net neutrality advocates, but it is far from clear that the policy is harmful. Using an economic analysis based upon relaxing assumptions in the simple model of perfect competition, so that it more closely reflects the complex internet ecosystem, we assess the extent to which it is plausible for zero-rating to be used to harm competition, consumer welfare and incentives for application innovation. We develop five questions to assist inquiry into the potential harm or benefits arising, which can be applied by competition authorities, regulators and the firms concerned to assist in sorting the cases less likely to be harmful from those that warrant further investigation.
策略性地使用零评级的移动数据
数字经济的特点是商品经常在多边平台上创造和分销,表现出高实例化和低再生产成本,这对产品和服务的定价构成了挑战。随着应用程序和传输之间的融合,互联网接入和内容的灵活定价方式正在开发。一种常用的定价策略是“零流量”,即特定应用程序的流量不计入互联网用户每月访问计划的“上限”。这种定价策略招致了网络中立倡导者的大量批评,但目前还远不清楚该政策是否有害。基于简单的完全竞争模型中放松假设的经济分析,使其更能反映复杂的互联网生态系统,我们评估了零评级在多大程度上可能损害竞争、消费者福利和应用创新激励。我们制定了五个问题来协助调查潜在的危害或利益,这些问题可以由竞争主管部门、监管机构和相关公司应用,以帮助从需要进一步调查的案件中区分不太可能造成伤害的案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信