A study of comparison about estimation methods of sediment yield

H. Kwon
{"title":"A study of comparison about estimation methods of sediment yield","authors":"H. Kwon","doi":"10.3741/JKWRA.2020.53.12.1109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, results of RUSLE which is most popular equation for estimating sediment and MSDPM and LADMP have been compared and analyzed by applying to real watershed of mountain area. Crop factor (C), preservation factor (P), and soil erosion factor (VM) of RUSLE can be subjectively selected and differently applied. Therefore, effects of those factors were estimated and compared with different values of factors. Furthermore, sediment yield has been estimated by MSDPM and LADMP according to 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 year return period. From the results, it was found that sediment yield can be resulted with 400% diffrence. And it was also found that MSDPM and LADMP can be applied in mountain area of Korea.","PeriodicalId":224359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korea Water Resources Association","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korea Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2020.53.12.1109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, results of RUSLE which is most popular equation for estimating sediment and MSDPM and LADMP have been compared and analyzed by applying to real watershed of mountain area. Crop factor (C), preservation factor (P), and soil erosion factor (VM) of RUSLE can be subjectively selected and differently applied. Therefore, effects of those factors were estimated and compared with different values of factors. Furthermore, sediment yield has been estimated by MSDPM and LADMP according to 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 year return period. From the results, it was found that sediment yield can be resulted with 400% diffrence. And it was also found that MSDPM and LADMP can be applied in mountain area of Korea.
产沙量估算方法的比较研究
本研究将最流行的泥沙估算方程RUSLE的结果与MSDPM和LADMP的结果应用于山地实际流域进行了对比分析。RUSLE的作物因子(C)、保存因子(P)和土壤侵蚀因子(VM)可以主观选择和不同应用。因此,估计这些因素的影响,并与不同的因子值进行比较。此外,MSDPM和LADMP根据10年、20年、30年、50年、100年和200年的回归期估算了产沙量。结果表明,该方法的产沙量相差400%。同时也发现MSDPM和LADMP在韩国山区是可以应用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信