EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN TERHADAP PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH KAWASAN DAN TIMBULAN DI KOTA TANGERANG SELATAN

Muara Torang Hadomuan, Retnowati WD Tuti
{"title":"EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN TERHADAP PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH KAWASAN DAN TIMBULAN DI KOTA TANGERANG SELATAN","authors":"Muara Torang Hadomuan, Retnowati WD Tuti","doi":"10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.4504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion in our study is about evaluating regional waste management policies and generation in South Tangerang City. In this policy, there are still many obstacles in the field, either performance or inadequate facilities. The achievement of policy objectives has not been optimal due to related parties to external factors, people who are less aware of waste management and the impact of waste hazards. This study aims to investigate the implementation of regional waste management and generation in South Tangerang City. The policy evaluation was analyzed from various aspects, namely: a) Effectiveness, policy evaluation is one of the important stages in the policy cycle. Policy evaluation is carried out after the public policy is implemented. This is to test the policies that have been made are successful or not. b) Efficiency, this is to show the best comparison between an activity and its results. This efficiency is a measure of success that is assessed in terms of human resources and costs to achieve the results of the policies implemented. c) Accuracy, to measure the extent to which a level of effectiveness satisfies a need, value, or opportunity to create a problem. d) Equity is a policy that is created and implemented which is oriented towards equity, meaning that it is a policy that is equitably distributed. e) Responsiveness, this criterion relates to how far a policy can satisfy the needs, preferences, or values ​​of certain groups. This criterion is very important because the analysis can satisfy other criteria. f) Accuracy, this criterion is closely related to rationality and substantive. Because the accuracy of the policy is not related to an individual criterion but two or more together. The method used in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Waste management has been regulated, but its implementation has not run optimally. Waste management efforts in South Tangerang City are not enough just to rely on the establishment of Waste Banks and the involvement of the community to participate in managing and also sorting out biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste. In addition, the downstream waste problem will not be solved if the upstream does not implement the existing regulations. The government must conduct socialization to the community to sort organic and inorganic waste from home, sort waste from the generation and source areas, Temporary Disposal Sites (TPS) and Final Disposal Sites (TPA).","PeriodicalId":122532,"journal":{"name":"Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.4504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The discussion in our study is about evaluating regional waste management policies and generation in South Tangerang City. In this policy, there are still many obstacles in the field, either performance or inadequate facilities. The achievement of policy objectives has not been optimal due to related parties to external factors, people who are less aware of waste management and the impact of waste hazards. This study aims to investigate the implementation of regional waste management and generation in South Tangerang City. The policy evaluation was analyzed from various aspects, namely: a) Effectiveness, policy evaluation is one of the important stages in the policy cycle. Policy evaluation is carried out after the public policy is implemented. This is to test the policies that have been made are successful or not. b) Efficiency, this is to show the best comparison between an activity and its results. This efficiency is a measure of success that is assessed in terms of human resources and costs to achieve the results of the policies implemented. c) Accuracy, to measure the extent to which a level of effectiveness satisfies a need, value, or opportunity to create a problem. d) Equity is a policy that is created and implemented which is oriented towards equity, meaning that it is a policy that is equitably distributed. e) Responsiveness, this criterion relates to how far a policy can satisfy the needs, preferences, or values ​​of certain groups. This criterion is very important because the analysis can satisfy other criteria. f) Accuracy, this criterion is closely related to rationality and substantive. Because the accuracy of the policy is not related to an individual criterion but two or more together. The method used in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Waste management has been regulated, but its implementation has not run optimally. Waste management efforts in South Tangerang City are not enough just to rely on the establishment of Waste Banks and the involvement of the community to participate in managing and also sorting out biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste. In addition, the downstream waste problem will not be solved if the upstream does not implement the existing regulations. The government must conduct socialization to the community to sort organic and inorganic waste from home, sort waste from the generation and source areas, Temporary Disposal Sites (TPS) and Final Disposal Sites (TPA).
对南部城市唐汉垃圾管理和廷廷兰的政策评估
本研究探讨的是对坦格朗市南部区域废弃物管理政策及其产生的评价。在这一政策中,实地仍存在许多障碍,要么是业绩,要么是设施不足。由于外部因素的相关方,人们对废物管理的认识不足以及废物危害的影响,政策目标的实现并不理想。本研究旨在调查坦格朗市南部区域废弃物管理与产生的实施情况。对政策评价从多个方面进行分析,即:a)有效性,政策评价是政策周期的重要阶段之一。政策评估是在公共政策实施后进行的。这是为了检验已经制定的政策是否成功。b)效率,这是一项活动及其结果之间的最佳比较。这种效率是衡量成功的一种标准,是根据人力资源和实现所执行政策成果的成本来评估的。c)准确性,衡量某一层次的有效性满足产生问题的需求、价值或机会的程度。d)公平是一项以公平为导向的政策,也就是说公平分配的政策。e)响应性,这一标准涉及到政策能在多大程度上满足某些群体的需求、偏好或价值观。这个标准是非常重要的,因为分析可以满足其他标准。f)准确性,这一标准与合理性和实质性密切相关。因为策略的准确性与单个标准无关,而是与两个或多个标准一起相关。在本研究中使用的方法是描述性的方法与定性的方法。废物管理得到了规范,但其实施并未达到最佳状态。南坦格朗市的废物管理工作,仅仅依靠建立废物银行和社区参与管理和分类生物可降解和不可降解的废物是不够的。此外,如果上游不执行现有的规定,下游的废物问题也不会得到解决。政府必须对社区进行社会化,从家庭中分类有机和无机废物,从产生和来源地区,临时处置地点(TPS)和最终处置地点(TPA)分类废物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信