{"title":"Asynchronous Dataflow De-Elastisation for Efficient Heterogeneous Synthesis","authors":"M. Mamaghani, D. Sokolov, J. Garside","doi":"10.1109/ACSD.2016.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic synthesis provides flexibility in design space exploration and improves design productivity by separating the concerns of system timing and functionality. This enables a designer to cope with the rapid increase of SoC complexity and to employ different computation and communication models with various timing constraints. De-elastisation emerged as a technique that transforms timing-free concurrent dataflow models to synchronous circuits while offering selective timing flexibility in the design. We adopt De-elastisation in an in-house EDA flow: it starts from a system specification in the Balsa language and uses eTeak to generate an elastic network of macro-modules. Based on structural analysis of the obtained network some of its portions are selectively transformed into synchronous circuits, in a supervised fashion, targeting better power and performance in the computation domain, whilst preserving fine-grained elasticity between communicating modules to handle timing uncertainties. We evaluate De-elastisation and compare it against some popular high-level synthesis technologies, namely LegUp, Bluespec, Chisel and Balsa using a set of benchmarks from the domain of Database Management Systems (DBMS) accelerators. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of Dataflow Decomposition and De-elastisation on the selected range of applications and its advantages in exploring the design trade-offs: a twofold increase in performance and 15% decrease in power consumption can be achievable at the expense of moderate area overhead.","PeriodicalId":334903,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2016.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Algorithmic synthesis provides flexibility in design space exploration and improves design productivity by separating the concerns of system timing and functionality. This enables a designer to cope with the rapid increase of SoC complexity and to employ different computation and communication models with various timing constraints. De-elastisation emerged as a technique that transforms timing-free concurrent dataflow models to synchronous circuits while offering selective timing flexibility in the design. We adopt De-elastisation in an in-house EDA flow: it starts from a system specification in the Balsa language and uses eTeak to generate an elastic network of macro-modules. Based on structural analysis of the obtained network some of its portions are selectively transformed into synchronous circuits, in a supervised fashion, targeting better power and performance in the computation domain, whilst preserving fine-grained elasticity between communicating modules to handle timing uncertainties. We evaluate De-elastisation and compare it against some popular high-level synthesis technologies, namely LegUp, Bluespec, Chisel and Balsa using a set of benchmarks from the domain of Database Management Systems (DBMS) accelerators. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of Dataflow Decomposition and De-elastisation on the selected range of applications and its advantages in exploring the design trade-offs: a twofold increase in performance and 15% decrease in power consumption can be achievable at the expense of moderate area overhead.