Macroeconomic Determinants of Income Inequality in Sri Lanka

Champika Dharmadasa
{"title":"Macroeconomic Determinants of Income Inequality in Sri Lanka","authors":"Champika Dharmadasa","doi":"10.56868/ijmt.v1i1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though several different income redistribution plans have been put in place by succeeding governments, income disparity has persisted in Sri Lanka over the past 50 years. Using secondary data from 1978 to 2021, this study aims to pinpoint the macroeconomic factors that contribute to income inequality in Sri Lanka. The basic estimating method is the autoregressive distributed lag model (ARDL), a rarely used analytical tool in Sri Lanka. The results show that the primary macroeconomic predictors of income inequality in Sri Lanka among the selected variables are government spending, trade openness, average prices, the share of agriculture in the GDP, and per capita GDP. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that trade openness and government spending cause income inequality, supporting Barro's theory. Additionally, the average price level and the percentage of agriculture in the GDP have helped to lessen income disparity in the nation. Per capita GDP also shows a marginal significance, supporting Kuznets’ view, which stresses that increasing a country’s GDP increases inequality. However, financial deepening and secondary school enrolment ratios do not show significant impacts emphasizing that financial and education factors do not contribute to inequality in the Sri Lankan setting. The study suggested that policy priority should be given to developing the agricultural sector and catching the spillover effect of international trade to reduce income inequality. That would ultimately lead to lowering trade-induced inequality. Furthermore, a crucial policy choice to lower the expense of daily life for the poor is to maintain a constant overall price level. Government transfer programs should primarily target the poor and maintain a proper monitoring mechanism to capture the outcome of those transfers also important. Currently, such a follow-up system is not in place; therefore, the government’s targets of reducing inequality couldn’t be realized to the fullest.","PeriodicalId":103724,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Thinking","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Thinking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56868/ijmt.v1i1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though several different income redistribution plans have been put in place by succeeding governments, income disparity has persisted in Sri Lanka over the past 50 years. Using secondary data from 1978 to 2021, this study aims to pinpoint the macroeconomic factors that contribute to income inequality in Sri Lanka. The basic estimating method is the autoregressive distributed lag model (ARDL), a rarely used analytical tool in Sri Lanka. The results show that the primary macroeconomic predictors of income inequality in Sri Lanka among the selected variables are government spending, trade openness, average prices, the share of agriculture in the GDP, and per capita GDP. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that trade openness and government spending cause income inequality, supporting Barro's theory. Additionally, the average price level and the percentage of agriculture in the GDP have helped to lessen income disparity in the nation. Per capita GDP also shows a marginal significance, supporting Kuznets’ view, which stresses that increasing a country’s GDP increases inequality. However, financial deepening and secondary school enrolment ratios do not show significant impacts emphasizing that financial and education factors do not contribute to inequality in the Sri Lankan setting. The study suggested that policy priority should be given to developing the agricultural sector and catching the spillover effect of international trade to reduce income inequality. That would ultimately lead to lowering trade-induced inequality. Furthermore, a crucial policy choice to lower the expense of daily life for the poor is to maintain a constant overall price level. Government transfer programs should primarily target the poor and maintain a proper monitoring mechanism to capture the outcome of those transfers also important. Currently, such a follow-up system is not in place; therefore, the government’s targets of reducing inequality couldn’t be realized to the fullest.
斯里兰卡收入不平等的宏观经济决定因素
尽管后来的政府实施了几种不同的收入再分配计划,但在过去的50年里,斯里兰卡的收入差距仍然存在。利用1978年至2021年的二手数据,本研究旨在确定导致斯里兰卡收入不平等的宏观经济因素。基本的估计方法是自回归分布滞后模型(ARDL),这是斯里兰卡很少使用的分析工具。结果表明,在选定的变量中,斯里兰卡收入不平等的主要宏观经济预测因子是政府支出、贸易开放程度、平均价格、农业占GDP的份额和人均GDP。此外,研究结果表明,贸易开放和政府支出导致收入不平等,支持巴罗的理论。此外,平均价格水平和农业在国内生产总值中的百分比有助于减少国家的收入差距。人均GDP也显示出边际显著性,这支持了库兹涅茨的观点,即一国GDP的增加会加剧不平等。然而,金融深化和中学入学率并没有显示出显著的影响,这强调了金融和教育因素并没有导致斯里兰卡的不平等。该研究建议,政策重点应放在发展农业部门和抓住国际贸易的溢出效应,以减少收入不平等。这将最终降低贸易导致的不平等。此外,降低穷人日常生活费用的一个关键政策选择是保持总价格水平不变。政府转移支付方案应主要针对穷人,并保持适当的监测机制,以掌握这些转移支付的结果,这也很重要。目前,没有这样的后续制度;因此,政府减少不平等的目标无法充分实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信