International Trade and Deforestation: Potential Policy Effects via a Global Economic Model

Jayson Beckman, R. Sands, A. Riddle, Tani Lee, Jacob M. Walloga
{"title":"International Trade and Deforestation: Potential Policy Effects via a Global Economic Model","authors":"Jayson Beckman, R. Sands, A. Riddle, Tani Lee, Jacob M. Walloga","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.262185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing global population and demand for food have led to rising agricultural production and demand for land; expanded agricultural land has often come from tropical deforestation. These forests support biodiverse ecosystems and further benefit the environment through carbon storage. This report analyzes patterns of deforestation in select countries to examine which commodities contribute most to “tropical” deforestation. ERS researchers use historical data on production and international trade patterns of four forest-risk commodities: palm oil, soybeans, beef, and forest products. Trade links for these commodities are quantified between the United States and six major exporting countries: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Deforestation in Argentina and Brazil is linked with production of beef and soybeans, while deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia is linked with production of palm oil and timber. A global economic model is used to assess two potential policies that could affect tropical forest loss. Results indicate that removing tariffs on these forest-risk products could increase deforestation, while prohibiting exports of illegally logged wood could reduce deforestation.","PeriodicalId":348588,"journal":{"name":"Economic Research Report","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Research Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.262185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Increasing global population and demand for food have led to rising agricultural production and demand for land; expanded agricultural land has often come from tropical deforestation. These forests support biodiverse ecosystems and further benefit the environment through carbon storage. This report analyzes patterns of deforestation in select countries to examine which commodities contribute most to “tropical” deforestation. ERS researchers use historical data on production and international trade patterns of four forest-risk commodities: palm oil, soybeans, beef, and forest products. Trade links for these commodities are quantified between the United States and six major exporting countries: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Deforestation in Argentina and Brazil is linked with production of beef and soybeans, while deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia is linked with production of palm oil and timber. A global economic model is used to assess two potential policies that could affect tropical forest loss. Results indicate that removing tariffs on these forest-risk products could increase deforestation, while prohibiting exports of illegally logged wood could reduce deforestation.
国际贸易与森林砍伐:基于全球经济模型的潜在政策影响
全球人口和粮食需求的增加导致农业生产和土地需求的增加;扩大的农业用地往往来自热带森林砍伐。这些森林支持生物多样性生态系统,并通过碳储存进一步有利于环境。本报告分析了选定国家的森林砍伐模式,以审查哪些商品对“热带”森林砍伐的贡献最大。研究人员使用了四种森林风险商品的生产和国际贸易模式的历史数据:棕榈油、大豆、牛肉和林产品。美国与六个主要出口国(阿根廷、巴西、巴拉圭、玻利维亚、印度尼西亚和马来西亚)之间的贸易联系是量化的。阿根廷和巴西的森林砍伐与牛肉和大豆的生产有关,而印度尼西亚和马来西亚的森林砍伐与棕榈油和木材的生产有关。一个全球经济模型被用来评估可能影响热带森林损失的两项潜在政策。结果表明,取消这些森林风险产品的关税可能会增加森林砍伐,而禁止非法砍伐木材的出口可能会减少森林砍伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信