Model of measurement of meaningful learning in distance learning environments

Vagner da Silva, Nizam Omar
{"title":"Model of measurement of meaningful learning in distance learning environments","authors":"Vagner da Silva, Nizam Omar","doi":"10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment methods used in the vast majority of virtual learning environments are not satisfactory for measuring student learning, many of which provide only tools that allow for summative assessment, thus providing incorrect information about learning. Many of these environments are not able to provide responses about student learning and do not provide activities that can be monitored by verifying learning performance. Provide students with activities that can be assessed by process-based instruments, how the conceptual framework is more advantageous and effective than punctuating assessment tools based on multiple-choice, test, or project questions. This article presents a model to assess learning in virtual learning environments through the use of individual and collaborative conceptual maps, student's conceptual organization indexes and previous knowledge index. In this model the conceptual maps are evaluated qualitatively and the results are useful to, among others, define the division of the groups for development of the collaborative conceptual map and to inform the index of the conceptual structure of the student. In addition, the model provides information for students and teachers about learning performance.","PeriodicalId":345129,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The assessment methods used in the vast majority of virtual learning environments are not satisfactory for measuring student learning, many of which provide only tools that allow for summative assessment, thus providing incorrect information about learning. Many of these environments are not able to provide responses about student learning and do not provide activities that can be monitored by verifying learning performance. Provide students with activities that can be assessed by process-based instruments, how the conceptual framework is more advantageous and effective than punctuating assessment tools based on multiple-choice, test, or project questions. This article presents a model to assess learning in virtual learning environments through the use of individual and collaborative conceptual maps, student's conceptual organization indexes and previous knowledge index. In this model the conceptual maps are evaluated qualitatively and the results are useful to, among others, define the division of the groups for development of the collaborative conceptual map and to inform the index of the conceptual structure of the student. In addition, the model provides information for students and teachers about learning performance.
远程学习环境中有意义学习的测量模型
绝大多数虚拟学习环境中使用的评估方法不能令人满意地衡量学生的学习,其中许多只提供了允许总结性评估的工具,从而提供了关于学习的不正确信息。许多这样的环境不能提供关于学生学习的响应,也不能提供可以通过验证学习表现来监控的活动。为学生提供可以通过基于过程的工具来评估的活动,概念框架如何比基于多项选择、测试或项目问题的标点评估工具更有利和有效。本文提出了一个模型,通过使用个人和协作的概念图、学生的概念组织索引和以前的知识索引来评估虚拟学习环境中的学习。在这个模型中,对概念图进行了定性评估,评估结果对定义协作概念图开发的小组划分以及为学生的概念结构提供索引很有用。此外,该模型还为学生和教师提供了有关学习绩效的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信