Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany (Report 2010)

A. Achleitner, J. Allmendinger, A. Gerybadze, D. Harhoff, Joachim Luther, P. Llerena
{"title":"Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany (Report 2010)","authors":"A. Achleitner, J. Allmendinger, A. Gerybadze, D. Harhoff, Joachim Luther, P. Llerena","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1676304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On behalf of the Federal Government of Germany, the Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation presents its third report. The format of the report has been revised this year. Part A of the EFI report 2010 discusses current developments and future challenges. Part B of the report then addresses five core topics. The indicators for the status of research and innovation in Part C are presented in a new format, which we hope will be more readily accessible for decision-makers in particular. The financial and economic crisis is not yet over, but there are signs of moderate growth potential for 2010. The German innovation system has done fairly well in the crisis. In addition, appropriate importance has been attached to research, innovation and education in the plans of the new Federal Government. As welcome as these declarations of intent are, it is important to follow these up by adopting specific measures in various key areas. In this third report, the following five topics are addressed in detail. First, the Expert Commission analyses the overall structure of the German innovation system and in particular the role of non-university research (Section B 1). It then presents an interim assessment of the Bologna Process, which is currently the subject of lively public debate (Section B 2). Twenty years after German reunification, research and innovation policies in eastern Germany are reviewed (Section B 3). The Expert Commission also considers Germany’s technological performance in the field of electromobility (Section B 4), and comments on the efforts of the European Commission to introduce a European Union patent and a unified patent court system (Section B 5). Highest priorities for the Federal Government should be the introduction of R&D tax support, improvements to the conditions for Business Angels and venture capital, and the systematic improvement of Germany’s education and research systems. Broad tax advantages for companies and individual tax-payers are no substitute for these urgently needed measures. Instruments which have been shown to have failed, such as the research premium, should be abandoned. Germany continues to do well in terms of creativity, inventiveness and openness to innovations. Despite financial constraints it is important to target investments in order to maintain and expand these strengths.","PeriodicalId":318785,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Evaluation of Strategic Outcomes (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Evaluation of Strategic Outcomes (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1676304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

On behalf of the Federal Government of Germany, the Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation presents its third report. The format of the report has been revised this year. Part A of the EFI report 2010 discusses current developments and future challenges. Part B of the report then addresses five core topics. The indicators for the status of research and innovation in Part C are presented in a new format, which we hope will be more readily accessible for decision-makers in particular. The financial and economic crisis is not yet over, but there are signs of moderate growth potential for 2010. The German innovation system has done fairly well in the crisis. In addition, appropriate importance has been attached to research, innovation and education in the plans of the new Federal Government. As welcome as these declarations of intent are, it is important to follow these up by adopting specific measures in various key areas. In this third report, the following five topics are addressed in detail. First, the Expert Commission analyses the overall structure of the German innovation system and in particular the role of non-university research (Section B 1). It then presents an interim assessment of the Bologna Process, which is currently the subject of lively public debate (Section B 2). Twenty years after German reunification, research and innovation policies in eastern Germany are reviewed (Section B 3). The Expert Commission also considers Germany’s technological performance in the field of electromobility (Section B 4), and comments on the efforts of the European Commission to introduce a European Union patent and a unified patent court system (Section B 5). Highest priorities for the Federal Government should be the introduction of R&D tax support, improvements to the conditions for Business Angels and venture capital, and the systematic improvement of Germany’s education and research systems. Broad tax advantages for companies and individual tax-payers are no substitute for these urgently needed measures. Instruments which have been shown to have failed, such as the research premium, should be abandoned. Germany continues to do well in terms of creativity, inventiveness and openness to innovations. Despite financial constraints it is important to target investments in order to maintain and expand these strengths.
德国的研究、创新和技术表现(2010年报告)
研究与创新专家委员会代表德国联邦政府提出其第三次报告。今年对报告的格式进行了修订。2010年EFI报告的A部分讨论了当前的发展和未来的挑战。报告的B部分随后讨论了五个核心主题。C部分的研究和创新状况指标采用了新的格式,我们希望决策者尤其能更容易获得。金融和经济危机尚未结束,但有迹象表明,2010年的增长潜力温和。德国的创新体系在危机中表现得相当不错。此外,在新的联邦政府的计划中,对研究、创新和教育给予了适当的重视。尽管这些意向声明是受欢迎的,但重要的是要采取后续行动,在各个关键领域采取具体措施。在第三份报告中,详细讨论了以下五个主题。首先,专家委员会分析了德国创新体系的整体结构,特别是非大学研究的作用(B 1部分)。然后,它提出了博洛尼亚进程的临时评估,这是目前热烈的公众辩论的主题(B 2部分)。审查了德国东部的研究和创新政策(第B 3节)。专家委员会还考虑了德国在电动汽车领域的技术表现(第B 4节),并对欧盟委员会为引入欧盟专利和统一专利法院系统所做的努力发表了评论(第B 5节)。联邦政府的最高优先事项应该是引入研发税收支持。改善商业天使和风险投资的条件,以及系统地改善德国的教育和研究体系。对企业和个人纳税人的广泛税收优惠不能取代这些迫切需要的措施。那些已经被证明是失败的工具,比如研究奖金,应该被放弃。德国在创造力、创造力和对创新的开放程度方面继续表现出色。尽管有财政限制,但重要的是要有目标的投资,以保持和扩大这些优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信