Tracing resilience, social dynamics and behavioral change: a review of agent-based flood risk models

Alessandro Taberna, T. Filatova, Debraj Roy, Brayton Noll
{"title":"Tracing resilience, social dynamics and behavioral change: a review of agent-based flood risk models","authors":"Alessandro Taberna, T. Filatova, Debraj Roy, Brayton Noll","doi":"10.18174/sesmo.2020a17938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change and rapid urbanization exacerbate flood risks worldwide. The recognition of the crucial role that human actors play in altering risks and resilience of flood-prone cities triggers a paradigm shift in climate risks assessments and drives the proliferation of computational models that include societal dynamics. Yet, replacing a representative rational actor dominant in climate policy models with a variety of behaviorally-rich agents that interact, learn, and adapt is not straightforward. Focusing on the costliest climate-exacerbated hazard, flooding, we review computational agent-based models that include behavioral change and societal dynamics. We distinguish between two streams of literature: one stemming from economics & behavioral sciences and another from hydrology. Our findings show that most studies focus on households while representing decisions of other agents (government, insurance, urban developers) simplistically and entirely overlooking firms' choices in the face of risks. The two communities vary in the extent they ground agents' rules in social theories and behavioral data when modeling boundedly-rational decisions. While both aspire to trace feedbacks that agents collectively instigate, they employ different learning and interactions when computing societal dynamics in the face of climate risks. Dynamics of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability components of flood risks driven by incremental adaptation of agents are well represented. We highlight that applying a complex adaptive system perspective to trace the evolution of resilience can lead to a better understanding of transformational adaptation. The methodological advances in computational models with heterogeneous behaviorally-rich adaptive agents are relevant for adaptation to different climate-driven hazards beyond flooding.","PeriodicalId":166291,"journal":{"name":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.2020a17938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Climate change and rapid urbanization exacerbate flood risks worldwide. The recognition of the crucial role that human actors play in altering risks and resilience of flood-prone cities triggers a paradigm shift in climate risks assessments and drives the proliferation of computational models that include societal dynamics. Yet, replacing a representative rational actor dominant in climate policy models with a variety of behaviorally-rich agents that interact, learn, and adapt is not straightforward. Focusing on the costliest climate-exacerbated hazard, flooding, we review computational agent-based models that include behavioral change and societal dynamics. We distinguish between two streams of literature: one stemming from economics & behavioral sciences and another from hydrology. Our findings show that most studies focus on households while representing decisions of other agents (government, insurance, urban developers) simplistically and entirely overlooking firms' choices in the face of risks. The two communities vary in the extent they ground agents' rules in social theories and behavioral data when modeling boundedly-rational decisions. While both aspire to trace feedbacks that agents collectively instigate, they employ different learning and interactions when computing societal dynamics in the face of climate risks. Dynamics of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability components of flood risks driven by incremental adaptation of agents are well represented. We highlight that applying a complex adaptive system perspective to trace the evolution of resilience can lead to a better understanding of transformational adaptation. The methodological advances in computational models with heterogeneous behaviorally-rich adaptive agents are relevant for adaptation to different climate-driven hazards beyond flooding.
追踪复原力、社会动态和行为变化:基于主体的洪水风险模型综述
气候变化和快速城市化加剧了世界范围内的洪水风险。认识到人类行为体在改变易发洪水城市的风险和恢复力方面发挥的关键作用,引发了气候风险评估的范式转变,并推动了包括社会动态在内的计算模型的扩散。然而,用各种行为丰富的相互作用、学习和适应的主体取代气候政策模型中占主导地位的具有代表性的理性行动者并非易事。以最昂贵的气候加剧灾害——洪水为重点,我们回顾了包括行为变化和社会动态在内的基于计算主体的模型。我们区分两种文学流派:一种来自经济学和行为科学,另一种来自水文学。我们的研究结果表明,大多数研究关注的是家庭,而代表其他代理人(政府、保险、城市开发商)的决策过于简单,完全忽视了企业在面对风险时的选择。这两个群体在为有限理性决策建模时,在一定程度上把代理人的规则建立在社会理论和行为数据的基础上。虽然两者都渴望追踪代理人集体煽动的反馈,但在面对气候风险计算社会动态时,他们采用了不同的学习和互动方式。洪水风险的危险、暴露和脆弱性组成部分的动态变化是由因子的增量适应驱动的。我们强调,应用复杂适应系统的观点来追踪弹性的演变可以更好地理解转型适应。具有异质性行为丰富适应性因子的计算模型的方法学进展与适应洪水以外的不同气候驱动的灾害有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信