Comparative study of advanced image reconstruction algorithms for complex arbitrary components

Sumana Sumana, CN Macleod, Simon Parke, D. Lines, Jon Bates
{"title":"Comparative study of advanced image reconstruction algorithms for complex arbitrary components","authors":"Sumana Sumana, CN Macleod, Simon Parke, D. Lines, Jon Bates","doi":"10.58286/28221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAccurate ultrasonic imaging and inspection of specimens with non-planar complex surfaces are often challenging from both transducer coupling and imaging perspectives. Several inspection strategies have been developed to inspect such complex interfaced components such as flat arrays with flexible wedges or water-filled chambers with a flexible membrane. In these methods, firstly surface profiles are estimated and then Fermat’s principle or other algorithms are applied to calculate delay laws. The main drawback of these methods is the longer computation time and therefore real time inspection is limited, also a coupling problem due to the complex geometries. Alternative approaches have been developed to compute the ultrasonic beam paths such as the Fast-Marching Method (FMM), Dijkstra’s algorithms, numerical analysis, bisection and root-finding algorithms for the inspection of complex surface components. These algorithms can be applied in two and three-dimensional domains resulting in high computation time. This work presents an experimental comparison of an iterative beamforming method for arbitrary shaped surface profile imaging against both Full Matrix Capture-Total Focusing Method (FMC-TFM) and CIVA simulation on an aluminium calibration block with Side drilled holes (SDHs) at various depths in the range of 15-80 mm. The performance of the iterative beamforming method is evaluated in terms of sensitivity, Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Array Performance Indicators (API). The method provides a 2 dB improved SNR when compared to FMC-TFM.\n","PeriodicalId":383798,"journal":{"name":"Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58286/28221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate ultrasonic imaging and inspection of specimens with non-planar complex surfaces are often challenging from both transducer coupling and imaging perspectives. Several inspection strategies have been developed to inspect such complex interfaced components such as flat arrays with flexible wedges or water-filled chambers with a flexible membrane. In these methods, firstly surface profiles are estimated and then Fermat’s principle or other algorithms are applied to calculate delay laws. The main drawback of these methods is the longer computation time and therefore real time inspection is limited, also a coupling problem due to the complex geometries. Alternative approaches have been developed to compute the ultrasonic beam paths such as the Fast-Marching Method (FMM), Dijkstra’s algorithms, numerical analysis, bisection and root-finding algorithms for the inspection of complex surface components. These algorithms can be applied in two and three-dimensional domains resulting in high computation time. This work presents an experimental comparison of an iterative beamforming method for arbitrary shaped surface profile imaging against both Full Matrix Capture-Total Focusing Method (FMC-TFM) and CIVA simulation on an aluminium calibration block with Side drilled holes (SDHs) at various depths in the range of 15-80 mm. The performance of the iterative beamforming method is evaluated in terms of sensitivity, Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Array Performance Indicators (API). The method provides a 2 dB improved SNR when compared to FMC-TFM.
复杂任意分量图像重建算法的比较研究
从换能器耦合和成像角度来看,具有非平面复杂表面的样品的准确超声成像和检测通常具有挑战性。已经开发了几种检测策略来检测这种复杂的界面组件,例如具有柔性楔形的平面阵列或具有柔性膜的充水腔。在这些方法中,首先估计表面轮廓,然后利用费马原理或其他算法计算延迟定律。这些方法的主要缺点是计算时间较长,因此实时检测受到限制,并且由于复杂的几何形状而存在耦合问题。计算超声波束路径的替代方法已经开发出来,如快速推进法(FMM)、Dijkstra算法、数值分析、用于复杂表面部件检测的对分和寻根算法。这些算法可以应用于二维和三维领域,计算时间短。本文对任意形状表面轮廓成像的迭代波束形成方法与全矩阵捕获-全聚焦法(FMC-TFM)和CIVA模拟进行了实验比较,该方法在15-80 mm范围内的不同深度的带有侧钻孔(sdh)的铝制校准块上进行了模拟。从灵敏度、信噪比(SNR)和阵列性能指标(API)三个方面对迭代波束形成方法进行了评价。与FMC-TFM相比,该方法的信噪比提高了2 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信