APPLYING THE STRATEGIES OF DISAGREEMENT EXPRESSION IN THE MOVIE OF AARON SORKIN’S A FEW GOOD MEN

Ahmad Febrianto Okem, N. K. Mirahayuni
{"title":"APPLYING THE STRATEGIES OF DISAGREEMENT EXPRESSION IN THE MOVIE OF AARON SORKIN’S A FEW GOOD MEN","authors":"Ahmad Febrianto Okem, N. K. Mirahayuni","doi":"10.30996/anaphora.v1i2.2092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study talks about the forms and strategies of disagreement expressions used by the characters in in Movie Script Aaron Sorkin’s A Few Good Men. The aims of this research are to find out the forms and types of disagreement strategies. The descriptive qualitative was used in this research and the data were the conversation among the characters. The analysis was based on Muntigl and Turnbull’s (1998) for the types of disagreement strategies in disagreement expression  and  for the  types  of  the  form based  on Liu’s (2004). The study involves thirty (30) data taken from drama plays. The study found that (1) disagreement expression can be identified by the form to describe the type of the sentence, they are declarative form involves  twenty three (23) data of disagreement expression which is found in all types of disagreement strategy, (2) Interrogative form involves four (4) data of disagreement expression which is found in challenge and counterclaims strategy. (3) Imperative form involves two (2) data of disagreement expression which is found in challenge strategy (4) Exclamative form involves one (1) data of disagreement expression which is found in contradict strategy. Second, the result of the analysis also shows that there are four types of disagreement strategies usually used by the characters: Irrelevancy Claims involves four (4) data, Challenge involves nine (9) data, Contradict involves nine (9) and Counterclaims involves eight (8) data.","PeriodicalId":269505,"journal":{"name":"ANAPHORA: Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANAPHORA: Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v1i2.2092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study talks about the forms and strategies of disagreement expressions used by the characters in in Movie Script Aaron Sorkin’s A Few Good Men. The aims of this research are to find out the forms and types of disagreement strategies. The descriptive qualitative was used in this research and the data were the conversation among the characters. The analysis was based on Muntigl and Turnbull’s (1998) for the types of disagreement strategies in disagreement expression  and  for the  types  of  the  form based  on Liu’s (2004). The study involves thirty (30) data taken from drama plays. The study found that (1) disagreement expression can be identified by the form to describe the type of the sentence, they are declarative form involves  twenty three (23) data of disagreement expression which is found in all types of disagreement strategy, (2) Interrogative form involves four (4) data of disagreement expression which is found in challenge and counterclaims strategy. (3) Imperative form involves two (2) data of disagreement expression which is found in challenge strategy (4) Exclamative form involves one (1) data of disagreement expression which is found in contradict strategy. Second, the result of the analysis also shows that there are four types of disagreement strategies usually used by the characters: Irrelevancy Claims involves four (4) data, Challenge involves nine (9) data, Contradict involves nine (9) and Counterclaims involves eight (8) data.
运用不同意见表达策略在电影《阿龙·索尔金》中的运用
本研究探讨了电影剧本《阿龙·索尔金:几个好人》中人物表达分歧的形式和策略。本研究的目的是找出歧见策略的形式和类型。本研究采用描述定性方法,数据为人物之间的对话。分析是基于Muntigl和turnbull (1998)对分歧中的分歧策略类型expression andÂ的the types of theÂ形式basedÂ对liu(2004)。这项研究涉及了30个来自戏剧的数据。研究发现:(1)不同意见表达可以通过描述句子类型的形式来识别,它们是陈述式involvesÂ二十三(23)不同意见表达的数据,这些数据存在于所有类型的不同意见策略中;(2)疑问式涉及四(4)不同意见表达的数据,这些数据存在于质疑和反诉策略中。(3)祈使句包含两(2)个挑战策略中的不一致表达数据;(4)感叹句包含一(1)个矛盾策略中的不一致表达数据。其次,分析结果还表明,字符通常使用四种不同的分歧策略:不相关索赔涉及四(4)个数据,挑战涉及九(9)个数据,反驳涉及九(9)个数据,反诉涉及八(8)个数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信