Phono-morpho-lexical similarity of auxiliary morphemes of the dictionary «Mukaddimat al-adab» (XIIІ century) Az-Zamakhshari with the Kazakh languag

А. Bainiazov, M. Maretbayeva, Sh. Zhalmakhanov, M. Dzhusupov
{"title":"Phono-morpho-lexical similarity of auxiliary morphemes of the dictionary «Mukaddimat al-adab» (XIIІ century) Az-Zamakhshari with the Kazakh languag","authors":"А. Bainiazov, M. Maretbayeva, Sh. Zhalmakhanov, M. Dzhusupov","doi":"10.31489/2020ph3/40-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a linguistic and historical overview of the problem of integration and differentiation of kinship and affinity of languages, including the features of unions. Based on the conducted linguistic analysis, the authors come to the conclusion that if adverbs in languages of different genders and tribes of Turkic origin are the result of integration of Turkic languages, then the division in the middle ages of Turkic languages (modern national languages, such as Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, etc. languages) is the result of the division of Turkic languages into branches, groups and subgroups. In the course of the work, the authors identify integration and differentiation processes, the kinship and affinity of languages and their integration into one language union, which was influenced by extralinguistic factors. Analysis and comparison of homonymous and polysemantic auxiliary morphemes, namely: case endings, plural endings, possessiveness and declension, suffixes of the noun, adjective, pronouns and verbs of the az-Zamakhshari dictionary [1] and the Kazakh language once again proves the historical uniformity of the vocabulary of the XII century and the modern Kazakh language. At the end of the article, the authors conclude that the differences between auxiliary morphemes in the «Dictionary» and the Kazakh language are expressed in phonetic composition, and semantic and grammatical functions of morphemes state the similarity and homogeneity of languages that belong to the Kipchak, Oguz and Karluk groups","PeriodicalId":285488,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Philology series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Philology series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2020ph3/40-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article provides a linguistic and historical overview of the problem of integration and differentiation of kinship and affinity of languages, including the features of unions. Based on the conducted linguistic analysis, the authors come to the conclusion that if adverbs in languages of different genders and tribes of Turkic origin are the result of integration of Turkic languages, then the division in the middle ages of Turkic languages (modern national languages, such as Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, etc. languages) is the result of the division of Turkic languages into branches, groups and subgroups. In the course of the work, the authors identify integration and differentiation processes, the kinship and affinity of languages and their integration into one language union, which was influenced by extralinguistic factors. Analysis and comparison of homonymous and polysemantic auxiliary morphemes, namely: case endings, plural endings, possessiveness and declension, suffixes of the noun, adjective, pronouns and verbs of the az-Zamakhshari dictionary [1] and the Kazakh language once again proves the historical uniformity of the vocabulary of the XII century and the modern Kazakh language. At the end of the article, the authors conclude that the differences between auxiliary morphemes in the «Dictionary» and the Kazakh language are expressed in phonetic composition, and semantic and grammatical functions of morphemes state the similarity and homogeneity of languages that belong to the Kipchak, Oguz and Karluk groups
《mukaddmat al-adab》(XIIІ世纪)Az-Zamakhshari词典与哈萨克语辅助语素的音素-词法相似性
本文从语言学和历史学的角度概述了语言亲缘性和亲缘性的整合和分化问题,包括结合的特征。在此基础上,笔者认为,如果突厥语不同性别、不同部落语言中的副词是突厥语融合的结果,那么突厥语(哈萨克语、吉尔吉斯语、乌兹别克语等现代民族语言)在中世纪的分化则是突厥语分支、群和亚群分化的结果。在研究过程中,作者发现了语言的整合和分化过程,语言的亲缘关系和亲和关系以及它们整合为一个语言联盟的过程受到语言外因素的影响。对《az-Zamakhshari》词典[1]和哈萨克语的同音和多义助词,即大小写词尾、复数词尾、所有格和变格、名词、形容词、代词和动词后缀的分析和比较,再次证明了十二世纪词汇和现代哈萨克语词汇的历史统一性。在文章的最后,作者得出结论,《字典》和哈萨克语中辅助语素的差异表现在语音组成上,语素的语义和语法功能表明了属于Kipchak, Oguz和Karluk语系的语言的相似性和同质性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信