Studi Komparasi Perilaku Struktur Gedung At-Tauhid Di Kota Surabaya Dengan Menggunakan SNI 1726-2012 Dan SNI 1726-2019

Heri Istiono, Yasmin Lisawiyani
{"title":"Studi Komparasi Perilaku Struktur Gedung At-Tauhid Di Kota Surabaya Dengan Menggunakan SNI 1726-2012 Dan SNI 1726-2019","authors":"Heri Istiono, Yasmin Lisawiyani","doi":"10.35334/be.v1i1.1854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seismic structure based on SNI 1726-2012 has been renewed in SNI 1726-2019 in term of the newest seismic map. This sort of renewal plan is necessary to anticipate the ruin of structure at At-Tauhid building in Surabaya. The plan for reinforced concrete structure was carried out based on SNI 2847-2013. To analyze the quake against the building, the researcher employed structural modeling by SAP 2000 program and eventually yielded the comparisons of spectrum response and structural behavior.The research results demonstrated that the spectrum response of seismic design improved by Sa12.99% and T 7.78%. In terms of control behavior analysis using SNI 1726-2012 and SNI 1726-2019, the structure of building  has met the requirements of time period, mass participation, static and dynamic base shears, interstorey drift, and dual systems. Time period obtained the similar value as Ta SAP by 1.61 second. Meanwhile, the mass participation employing SNI 1726-2019 reached faster diverse number at the 30th mode. Static base shear increased 12.99%, whereas dynamic base shear inclined 32.95%. Interstorey drift improved 34.73% in X direction and 34.54% in Y direction. The dual systems based on SNI 1726-2012 got OMRF retaining the seismic force of design 50.83% in X direction and 43.75% in Y direction, whereas SNI 1726-2019 had OMRF resisting the seismic force of design 50.87% in X direction and 43.77% in Y direction.","PeriodicalId":155505,"journal":{"name":"Borneo Engineering : Jurnal Teknik Sipil","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borneo Engineering : Jurnal Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/be.v1i1.1854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The seismic structure based on SNI 1726-2012 has been renewed in SNI 1726-2019 in term of the newest seismic map. This sort of renewal plan is necessary to anticipate the ruin of structure at At-Tauhid building in Surabaya. The plan for reinforced concrete structure was carried out based on SNI 2847-2013. To analyze the quake against the building, the researcher employed structural modeling by SAP 2000 program and eventually yielded the comparisons of spectrum response and structural behavior.The research results demonstrated that the spectrum response of seismic design improved by Sa12.99% and T 7.78%. In terms of control behavior analysis using SNI 1726-2012 and SNI 1726-2019, the structure of building  has met the requirements of time period, mass participation, static and dynamic base shears, interstorey drift, and dual systems. Time period obtained the similar value as Ta SAP by 1.61 second. Meanwhile, the mass participation employing SNI 1726-2019 reached faster diverse number at the 30th mode. Static base shear increased 12.99%, whereas dynamic base shear inclined 32.95%. Interstorey drift improved 34.73% in X direction and 34.54% in Y direction. The dual systems based on SNI 1726-2012 got OMRF retaining the seismic force of design 50.83% in X direction and 43.75% in Y direction, whereas SNI 1726-2019 had OMRF resisting the seismic force of design 50.87% in X direction and 43.77% in Y direction.
使用SNI 1726-2012和SNI 1726-2019对泗水塔希德建筑结构的行为比较研究
根据最新地震图,SNI 1726-2019更新了基于SNI 1726-2012的地震结构。这种更新计划是必要的,以预测在泗水的at - tauhid大厦结构的破坏。钢筋混凝土结构方案依据SNI 2847-2013进行。为了分析地震对建筑物的影响,研究人员使用SAP 2000程序进行结构建模,并最终得出了频谱反应和结构行为的比较。研究结果表明,该方案抗震设计谱响应提高了Sa12.99%, t7.78%。在SNI 1726-2012和SNI 1726-2019控制行为分析中,建筑结构满足时间段、大众参与、静、动基础剪切、层间漂移、双体系等要求。Time period与Ta SAP的值相差1.61秒。同时,采用SNI 1726-2019的大众参与在第30种模式下达到了更快的多样化。静基剪增加12.99%,动基剪增加32.95%。层间漂移在X方向和Y方向分别改善了34.73%和34.54%。基于SNI 1726-2012双体系的OMRF在X方向和Y方向分别保留了设计的50.83%和43.75%的地震力,而SNI 1726-2019双体系的OMRF在X方向和Y方向分别抵抗了设计的50.87%和43.77%的地震力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信