Analysis of deep learning approaches for automated prostate segmentation: literature review

А. Э. Талышинский, Б. Г. Гулиев, Ирина Камышанская, А. И. Новиков, У Ж Жанбырбекулы, А. Э. Мамедов, И.А. Поваго, А А Андриянов, A. Talyshinskii, B. G. Guliev, I. G. Kamyshanskaya, A. I. Novikov, U. Zhanbyrbekuly, A. E. Mamedov, I. A. Povago, A. Andriyanov, A. Talyshinskii
{"title":"Analysis of deep learning approaches for automated prostate segmentation: literature review","authors":"А. Э. Талышинский, Б. Г. Гулиев, Ирина Камышанская, А. И. Новиков, У Ж Жанбырбекулы, А. Э. Мамедов, И.А. Поваго, А А Андриянов, A. Talyshinskii, B. G. Guliev, I. G. Kamyshanskaya, A. I. Novikov, U. Zhanbyrbekuly, A. E. Mamedov, I. A. Povago, A. Andriyanov, A. Talyshinskii","doi":"10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-2-101-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Delineation of the prostate boundaries represents the initial step in understanding the state of the whole organ and is mainly manually performed, which takes a long time and directly depends on the experience of the radiologists. Automated prostate selection can be carried out by various approaches, including using artificial intelligence and its subdisciplines – machine and deep learning.Aim. To reveal the most accurate deep learning-based methods for prostate segmentation on multiparametric magnetic resonance images.Materials and methods. The search was conducted in July 2022 in the PubMed database with a special clinical query (((AI) OR (machine learning)) OR (deep learning)) AND (prostate) AND (MRI). The inclusion criteria were availability of the full article, publication date no more than five years prior to the time of the search, availability of a quantitative assessment of the reconstruction accuracy by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculation.Results. The search returned 521 articles, but only 24 papers including descriptions of 33 different deep learning networks for prostate segmentation were selected for the final review. The median number of cases included for artificial intelligence training was 100 with a range from 25 to 365. The optimal DSC value threshold (0.9), in which automated segmentation is only slightly inferior to manual delineation, was achieved in 21 studies.Conclusion. Despite significant achievements in the development of deep learning-based prostate segmentation algorithms, there are still problems and limitations that should be resolved before artificial intelligence can be implemented in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":216890,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Urology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-2-101-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Delineation of the prostate boundaries represents the initial step in understanding the state of the whole organ and is mainly manually performed, which takes a long time and directly depends on the experience of the radiologists. Automated prostate selection can be carried out by various approaches, including using artificial intelligence and its subdisciplines – machine and deep learning.Aim. To reveal the most accurate deep learning-based methods for prostate segmentation on multiparametric magnetic resonance images.Materials and methods. The search was conducted in July 2022 in the PubMed database with a special clinical query (((AI) OR (machine learning)) OR (deep learning)) AND (prostate) AND (MRI). The inclusion criteria were availability of the full article, publication date no more than five years prior to the time of the search, availability of a quantitative assessment of the reconstruction accuracy by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculation.Results. The search returned 521 articles, but only 24 papers including descriptions of 33 different deep learning networks for prostate segmentation were selected for the final review. The median number of cases included for artificial intelligence training was 100 with a range from 25 to 365. The optimal DSC value threshold (0.9), in which automated segmentation is only slightly inferior to manual delineation, was achieved in 21 studies.Conclusion. Despite significant achievements in the development of deep learning-based prostate segmentation algorithms, there are still problems and limitations that should be resolved before artificial intelligence can be implemented in clinical practice.
自动前列腺分割的深度学习方法分析:文献综述
背景。前列腺边界的划定是了解整个器官状态的第一步,主要是人工完成的,这需要很长时间,并且直接取决于放射科医生的经验。自动前列腺选择可以通过各种方法进行,包括使用人工智能及其分支学科——机器和深度学习。揭示基于深度学习的多参数磁共振图像前列腺分割最准确的方法。材料和方法。该检索于2022年7月在PubMed数据库中以特殊的临床查询((AI) OR(机器学习)OR(深度学习)AND(前列腺)AND (MRI)进行。纳入标准是全文的可获得性,出版日期不超过检索时间5年,通过Dice相似系数(DSC)计算对重建准确性进行定量评估的可获得性。搜索返回了521篇文章,但只有24篇论文被选中进行最终审查,其中包括33种不同的前列腺分割深度学习网络的描述。用于人工智能训练的案例中位数为100,范围从25到365。在21项研究中获得了最佳DSC值阈值(0.9),其中自动分割仅略低于人工描绘。尽管基于深度学习的前列腺分割算法的发展取得了重大成就,但在人工智能应用于临床实践之前,仍有一些问题和局限性需要解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信