Keeping complexity alive: restorative and responsive approaches to culture change

G. Burford
{"title":"Keeping complexity alive:\n restorative and responsive approaches\n to culture change","authors":"G. Burford","doi":"10.5553/IJRJ/258908912018001003002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human services are fraught with history of failure related to grasping oversim‐ plified, across-the-board solutions that are expected to work in all situations for all groups of people. This article reviews some of the long-standing and current chal‐ lenges for governance of programmes in maintaining cultures that safeguard restorative and responsive standards, principles and values, thereby amplifying and enhancing their centrality to relational engagement within families, groups, communities and organisations. Despite their potential for helping groups of people grapple with the complex dynamics that impact their lives, restorative justice approaches are seen as no less vulnerable to being whittled down to technical rou‐ tines through practitioner and sponsor colonisation than other practices. This arti‐ cle explores some of the ways culture can work to erode and support the achieve‐ ment of restorative standards, and why restorative justice and regulation that is responsive to the ongoing experiences of affected persons offers unique paths for‐ ward for achieving justice. Included in this exploration are the ways that moral panic and top-down, command-and-control management narrow relational approaches to tackling complex problems and protect interests that reproduce social and economic inequality.","PeriodicalId":430026,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of\n Restorative Justice","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of\n Restorative Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ/258908912018001003002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The human services are fraught with history of failure related to grasping oversim‐ plified, across-the-board solutions that are expected to work in all situations for all groups of people. This article reviews some of the long-standing and current chal‐ lenges for governance of programmes in maintaining cultures that safeguard restorative and responsive standards, principles and values, thereby amplifying and enhancing their centrality to relational engagement within families, groups, communities and organisations. Despite their potential for helping groups of people grapple with the complex dynamics that impact their lives, restorative justice approaches are seen as no less vulnerable to being whittled down to technical rou‐ tines through practitioner and sponsor colonisation than other practices. This arti‐ cle explores some of the ways culture can work to erode and support the achieve‐ ment of restorative standards, and why restorative justice and regulation that is responsive to the ongoing experiences of affected persons offers unique paths for‐ ward for achieving justice. Included in this exploration are the ways that moral panic and top-down, command-and-control management narrow relational approaches to tackling complex problems and protect interests that reproduce social and economic inequality.
保持复杂性:文化变革的恢复性和响应性方法
人类服务充满了失败的历史,这些失败与把握过度简化、全面的解决方案有关,这些解决方案被期望在所有情况下为所有人群工作。本文回顾了在维护文化方面的一些长期和当前的挑战,这些文化保护了恢复性和响应性的标准、原则和价值观,从而扩大和增强了它们在家庭、团体、社区和组织中关系参与的中心地位。尽管恢复性司法方法具有帮助人群应对影响其生活的复杂动态的潜力,但与其他做法相比,人们认为恢复性司法方法同样容易通过从业者和赞助商殖民化而被精简为技术流程。本文探讨了文化可以侵蚀和支持恢复性标准实现的一些方式,以及为什么恢复性司法和监管是对受影响者持续经历的回应,为实现正义提供了独特的途径。这一探索包括道德恐慌和自上而下、命令和控制管理的方式,这些方法使解决复杂问题和保护再现社会和经济不平等的利益的关系狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信