POLITICS WITH AND WITHOUT ROMANCE: DANTE�S MONARCHIA VERSUS MACHIAVELLI�S IL PRINCIPE

R. Neck
{"title":"POLITICS WITH AND WITHOUT ROMANCE: DANTE�S MONARCHIA VERSUS MACHIAVELLI�S IL PRINCIPE","authors":"R. Neck","doi":"10.35603/sws.iscah.2022/s03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contrasts Monarchia by Dante Alighieri with Il Principe by Niccolo Machiavelli. It is argued that the Principe not only incorporates the realities of politics but is also superior to the Monarchia as a scientific work because it avoids the latter�s commitment to scholastic philosophy and has greater empirical relevance and logical consistency. Moreover, it can serve to some extent as a role model for an approach to a positive analysis of politics even today.","PeriodicalId":187162,"journal":{"name":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscah.2022/s03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper contrasts Monarchia by Dante Alighieri with Il Principe by Niccolo Machiavelli. It is argued that the Principe not only incorporates the realities of politics but is also superior to the Monarchia as a scientific work because it avoids the latter�s commitment to scholastic philosophy and has greater empirical relevance and logical consistency. Moreover, it can serve to some extent as a role model for an approach to a positive analysis of politics even today.
有或没有浪漫的政治:但丁的君主制与马基雅维利的原则
本文将但丁的《君主论》与马基雅维利的《原理论》进行对比。作者认为,《普林西比》不仅包含了政治现实,而且作为一部科学著作,它优于《君主论》,因为它避免了后者对经院哲学的承诺,具有更大的经验相关性和逻辑一致性。此外,即使在今天,它在某种程度上也可以作为一种积极分析政治的方法的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信