FUNCTIONAL TRADITIONALISM OF THE RUSSIAN POLICE IN THE LATE XVIII – EARLY XX CENTURIES

Dmitry A. Yaltaev
{"title":"FUNCTIONAL TRADITIONALISM OF THE RUSSIAN POLICE IN THE LATE XVIII – EARLY XX CENTURIES","authors":"Dmitry A. Yaltaev","doi":"10.47026/2712-9454-2022-3-2-48-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the imperial period of the existence of Russia, traditions were created by Catherine III. They remained until the beginning of the XX century. Many traditions were spelled out in the Charter of the Deanery of 1782. Legislators were guided by the Charter up to modern Russia. This determined the frequent unification of the stages of police development in one period, chronologically coinciding with the imperial period of the history of Russia (XVIII – early XIX century). The activities of the police were based on general moral rules for overseeing any order in the life of the society, performing a wide range of functions: political, law enforcement, fiscal and spiritual. One of the reasons for the traditional authority of the police was the class principle of the existence of society. Power was based on the landowner nobility. The legislation was distinguished by a mixture of moral councils and legal norms, temporary administrative orders and permanent laws. The monarchical supremacy of power over law was often manifested. The material support of the police was poor. This maintained personnel difficulties and elements of corruption. Many top officials of the state from M.M. Speransky to P.A. Stolypin called for changing the principles of the organization and functioning of the police. In the second half of the XIX century, the modern principles of judicial proceedings were implemented and reforms, aimed at dividing the powers of various power structures, were carried out. But the police remained the main administrative unit for the implementation of power in the province. Certain reforms of the beginning of the XX century (the creation of a police guard, separation from the rural police) had only a structural purpose and did not play a crucial role. This determined the conservatism, generalization and partly uncertainty in the activities of the police until the collapse of the empire in 1917.","PeriodicalId":212815,"journal":{"name":"Historical Search","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47026/2712-9454-2022-3-2-48-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the imperial period of the existence of Russia, traditions were created by Catherine III. They remained until the beginning of the XX century. Many traditions were spelled out in the Charter of the Deanery of 1782. Legislators were guided by the Charter up to modern Russia. This determined the frequent unification of the stages of police development in one period, chronologically coinciding with the imperial period of the history of Russia (XVIII – early XIX century). The activities of the police were based on general moral rules for overseeing any order in the life of the society, performing a wide range of functions: political, law enforcement, fiscal and spiritual. One of the reasons for the traditional authority of the police was the class principle of the existence of society. Power was based on the landowner nobility. The legislation was distinguished by a mixture of moral councils and legal norms, temporary administrative orders and permanent laws. The monarchical supremacy of power over law was often manifested. The material support of the police was poor. This maintained personnel difficulties and elements of corruption. Many top officials of the state from M.M. Speransky to P.A. Stolypin called for changing the principles of the organization and functioning of the police. In the second half of the XIX century, the modern principles of judicial proceedings were implemented and reforms, aimed at dividing the powers of various power structures, were carried out. But the police remained the main administrative unit for the implementation of power in the province. Certain reforms of the beginning of the XX century (the creation of a police guard, separation from the rural police) had only a structural purpose and did not play a crucial role. This determined the conservatism, generalization and partly uncertainty in the activities of the police until the collapse of the empire in 1917.
十八世纪末二十世纪初俄国警察的功能传统主义
在俄国存在的帝国时期,传统是由叶卡捷琳娜三世创造的。它们一直保留到二十世纪初。许多传统都在1782年的《院长宪章》中阐明。直到现代俄罗斯,立法者都受《宪章》的指导。这决定了警察发展阶段在一个时期内的频繁统一,按时间顺序与俄罗斯历史上的帝国时期(十八世纪至十九世纪初)一致。警察的活动以监督社会生活中任何秩序的一般道德规则为基础,执行广泛的职能:政治、执法、财政和精神。警察传统权威存在的原因之一是社会存在的阶级原则。权力建立在地主贵族的基础上。立法的特点是道德委员会和法律规范、临时行政命令和永久法律的混合。权力高于法律的君主至上主义经常表现出来。警察的物质支持很差。这就造成了人员困难和腐败的因素。从m·m·斯佩兰斯基(M.M. Speransky)到p·a·斯托雷平(P.A. Stolypin),许多国家高级官员都呼吁改变警察的组织原则和职能。在十九世纪下半叶,实施了现代司法程序原则,并进行了旨在划分各种权力结构权力的改革。但警察仍然是该省行使权力的主要行政单位。二十世纪初的某些改革(建立警卫队,从农村警察中分离出来)只有结构性目的,没有发挥关键作用。这决定了警察活动的保守性、泛化性和部分不确定性,直到1917年帝国崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信