Is the World Truly 'Flat'? Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets

Y. Hong, P. Pavlou
{"title":"Is the World Truly 'Flat'? Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets","authors":"Y. Hong, P. Pavlou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2371748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visionaries have conjectured that the world is becoming a level playing field due to the Internet that allows people to connect from anywhere around the globe. We examine this “flat world” conjecture in the context of online labor markets by theoretically proposing and empirically quantifying the economic effects of a set of common global differences (language, time zone, cultural, and economic development differences across countries) on both employers’ hiring decisions and service providers’ pricing decisions. The empirical study integrates a unique dataset formed by a sample of 261,060 bids for 25,839 IT projects (software development) from a global online labor market matched with five archival sources on language, time zone, culture, economic development, and exchange rates. We quantify the role of global differences (“frictions”) in terms of the employers’ price elasticity and the service providers’ level of sensitivity to these differences. The econometric identification hinges on the exogenous variation of the exchange rate fluctuations of global currencies against the US dollar, as a “cost-shifter” type Instrumental Variable (IV). The results show that employers are negatively affected by global differences; notably, on average, a different language reduces an employer’s utility by about 5%; each hour time difference decreases the employer’s utility by about 0.71%; while a different culture reduces the employer’s utility. Contrary to the literature and industry expectations, controlling for compensation, employers prefer service providers from countries with higher economic development. On the other hand, when submitting their bids, providers are sensitive to language and time zone differences, but not to cultural differences. The strong economic effects of the proposed global differences imply that online labor markets are not a truly level (“flat”) playing field, particularly for service providers from poor, non-English speaking countries with traditional (religious versus secular) cultural values and a large time zone difference from employers’ geographical locations (predominantly North America and Europe). We discuss the study’s theoretical and managerial implications for reducing the “frictions” from these global differences and designing “flatter” online labor markets.","PeriodicalId":420730,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Bargaining Theory (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Bargaining Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2371748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Visionaries have conjectured that the world is becoming a level playing field due to the Internet that allows people to connect from anywhere around the globe. We examine this “flat world” conjecture in the context of online labor markets by theoretically proposing and empirically quantifying the economic effects of a set of common global differences (language, time zone, cultural, and economic development differences across countries) on both employers’ hiring decisions and service providers’ pricing decisions. The empirical study integrates a unique dataset formed by a sample of 261,060 bids for 25,839 IT projects (software development) from a global online labor market matched with five archival sources on language, time zone, culture, economic development, and exchange rates. We quantify the role of global differences (“frictions”) in terms of the employers’ price elasticity and the service providers’ level of sensitivity to these differences. The econometric identification hinges on the exogenous variation of the exchange rate fluctuations of global currencies against the US dollar, as a “cost-shifter” type Instrumental Variable (IV). The results show that employers are negatively affected by global differences; notably, on average, a different language reduces an employer’s utility by about 5%; each hour time difference decreases the employer’s utility by about 0.71%; while a different culture reduces the employer’s utility. Contrary to the literature and industry expectations, controlling for compensation, employers prefer service providers from countries with higher economic development. On the other hand, when submitting their bids, providers are sensitive to language and time zone differences, but not to cultural differences. The strong economic effects of the proposed global differences imply that online labor markets are not a truly level (“flat”) playing field, particularly for service providers from poor, non-English speaking countries with traditional (religious versus secular) cultural values and a large time zone difference from employers’ geographical locations (predominantly North America and Europe). We discuss the study’s theoretical and managerial implications for reducing the “frictions” from these global differences and designing “flatter” online labor markets.
世界真的是平的吗?来自在线劳动力市场的经验证据
有远见的人推测,由于互联网允许人们从全球任何地方联系,世界正在成为一个公平的竞争环境。我们在在线劳动力市场的背景下,通过理论提出和实证量化一系列共同的全球差异(各国的语言、时区、文化和经济发展差异)对雇主招聘决策和服务提供商定价决策的经济影响,来检验这一“平坦世界”猜想。该实证研究整合了一个独特的数据集,该数据集由来自全球在线劳动力市场的25,839个IT项目(软件开发)的261,060个投标样本组成,并与语言,时区,文化,经济发展和汇率的五个档案来源相匹配。我们根据雇主的价格弹性和服务提供商对这些差异的敏感程度,量化了全球差异(“摩擦”)的作用。计量经济鉴定取决于全球货币对美元汇率波动的外生变化,作为“成本转移”型工具变量(IV)。结果表明,雇主受到全球差异的负面影响;值得注意的是,平均而言,不同的语言会使雇主的效用降低约5%;每小时的时差使雇主的效用降低约0.71%;而不同的文化会降低雇主的效用。与文献和行业预期相反,在控制薪酬的情况下,雇主更倾向于来自经济发展水平较高的国家的服务提供商。另一方面,在提交投标时,供应商对语言和时区的差异很敏感,但对文化差异却不敏感。所提出的全球差异的强大经济影响意味着,在线劳动力市场并不是一个真正公平(“平坦”)的竞争环境,特别是对于来自贫穷、非英语国家的服务提供商来说,这些国家具有传统(宗教与世俗)文化价值观,而且与雇主的地理位置(主要是北美和欧洲)有很大的时区差异。我们讨论了该研究的理论和管理意义,以减少这些全球差异带来的“摩擦”,并设计“更平坦”的在线劳动力市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信