The Experience of Being Tested for Allergies: The Views of Children and Their Parents

Helen E. Smith, Clare E Brown, Annalee Robertson, Laura H. Stuttaford, R. Rashid, Christina J. Jones
{"title":"The Experience of Being Tested for Allergies: The Views of Children and Their Parents","authors":"Helen E. Smith, Clare E Brown, Annalee Robertson, Laura H. Stuttaford, R. Rashid, Christina J. Jones","doi":"10.4172/2155-6121.1000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Children with suspected allergies can be tested for IgE sensitivities with in vivo or in vitro testing, but parents’ and childrens’ experiences of these different allergy test modalities have not been studied. \nObjective: To investigate parents’ and childrens’ experiences and views of allergy testing (Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE blood tests). \nMethods: Qualitative study of children and their parents attending a paediatric allergy clinic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone using an interview guide that explored their experience of allergy testing. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was performed. \nResults: 16 parents and 6 children were interviewed. The characteristics of skin prick tests particularly valued were the immediacy and visibility of results, which enabled testing and interpretation to be achieved within a single clinic appointment. In vitro testing offered simplicity and speed, with only a single puncture site and procedural speed. Some perceived it to be a superior test as it was a laboratory-based test. Parental accounts of in vitro testing often included reference to their own discomfort, as well as their young child’s discomfort as they were restrained for venepuncture. \nConclusion and clinical relevance: Several areas for improvement in allergy testing service provision were highlighted, particularly a need for greater information in advance about what will happen in the allergy clinic to reduce anxiety and misunderstandings. Also, SPT with an already identified allergen can cause concern and distress as it appeared to contradict previous instructions given for allergen avoidance.","PeriodicalId":290131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Therapy","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6121.1000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with suspected allergies can be tested for IgE sensitivities with in vivo or in vitro testing, but parents’ and childrens’ experiences of these different allergy test modalities have not been studied. Objective: To investigate parents’ and childrens’ experiences and views of allergy testing (Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE blood tests). Methods: Qualitative study of children and their parents attending a paediatric allergy clinic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone using an interview guide that explored their experience of allergy testing. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was performed. Results: 16 parents and 6 children were interviewed. The characteristics of skin prick tests particularly valued were the immediacy and visibility of results, which enabled testing and interpretation to be achieved within a single clinic appointment. In vitro testing offered simplicity and speed, with only a single puncture site and procedural speed. Some perceived it to be a superior test as it was a laboratory-based test. Parental accounts of in vitro testing often included reference to their own discomfort, as well as their young child’s discomfort as they were restrained for venepuncture. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Several areas for improvement in allergy testing service provision were highlighted, particularly a need for greater information in advance about what will happen in the allergy clinic to reduce anxiety and misunderstandings. Also, SPT with an already identified allergen can cause concern and distress as it appeared to contradict previous instructions given for allergen avoidance.
被测试过敏的经验:儿童和他们的父母的观点
背景:疑似过敏的儿童可以通过体内或体外测试进行IgE敏感性测试,但尚未研究父母和儿童对这些不同过敏测试方式的经历。目的:了解家长和儿童对过敏试验(皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和过敏原特异性IgE血试)的体会和看法。方法:对在儿科过敏门诊就诊的儿童及其父母进行定性研究。半结构化的访谈是通过电话进行的,访谈指南探讨了他们的过敏测试经验。采访被数字记录下来,并逐字抄写。进行主题内容分析。结果:对16名家长和6名儿童进行了访谈。皮肤点刺试验特别受重视的特点是结果的即时性和可见性,这使得在一次诊所预约中即可完成测试和解释。体外测试简单快捷,只有一个穿刺点,操作速度快。有些人认为这是一个更好的测试,因为它是一个基于实验室的测试。父母对体外测试的描述通常包括他们自己的不适,以及他们年幼的孩子在静脉穿刺时的不适。结论和临床意义:我们强调了过敏症检测服务提供中需要改进的几个方面,特别是需要提前获得更多关于过敏临床会发生什么的信息,以减少焦虑和误解。此外,使用已经确定的过敏原进行SPT可能会引起担忧和痛苦,因为它似乎与先前给出的避免过敏原的说明相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信