Severity Assessment of Problems in Turkish Building Audit System: A Fuzzy AHP Approach

Murat Cevikbas, Ozan Okudan, Z. Işık
{"title":"Severity Assessment of Problems in Turkish Building Audit System: A Fuzzy AHP Approach","authors":"Murat Cevikbas, Ozan Okudan, Z. Işık","doi":"10.18400/tjce.1209174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Building Audit system (BAS) has often been criticized due to its various drawbacks by researchers, construction practitioners, and professional chambers. Existing studies, however, do not comprehensively investigate the problems seen in Turkish BAS. Since the decision-makers are provided with little knowledge about the drawbacks of the system, they can barely develop new strategies to improve its effectiveness and efficiency. To bridge this gap, this study aimed to identify the drawbacks seen in the implementation of the Turkish Building Audit System (BAS). In addition, the severity of each drawback was also determined to further provide comprehensive guidance to policymakers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Initially, an extensive literature review was conducted to identify problems of Turkish BAS. Identified problems were then validated through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) sessions with the participation of 12 experts who have diverse experience in the related field. Later, a questionnaire survey was designed to measure the severity of each problem/drawback and the data was collected from 15 construction practitioners. The data were then analyzed using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method to measure the severities of problems seen in Turkish BAS. Then, the problems were prioritized based on their severities. At the final step, sensitivity analysis was conducted to measure the robustness and reliability of the results derived from the FAHP method. Results revealed that problems such as “Lack of practical knowledge of technical staff”, “Absence of site supervisor at the site” “Political pressure” and “Neglecting technical specifications and procedures” were determined as the most severe problems that need urgent attention of decision-makers. It is highly believed that this study will guide decision-makers for the improvement of existing legislation. Additionally, it is also believed that practitioners will take necessary precautions beforehand by using the outputs of this study.","PeriodicalId":241324,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1209174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Building Audit system (BAS) has often been criticized due to its various drawbacks by researchers, construction practitioners, and professional chambers. Existing studies, however, do not comprehensively investigate the problems seen in Turkish BAS. Since the decision-makers are provided with little knowledge about the drawbacks of the system, they can barely develop new strategies to improve its effectiveness and efficiency. To bridge this gap, this study aimed to identify the drawbacks seen in the implementation of the Turkish Building Audit System (BAS). In addition, the severity of each drawback was also determined to further provide comprehensive guidance to policymakers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Initially, an extensive literature review was conducted to identify problems of Turkish BAS. Identified problems were then validated through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) sessions with the participation of 12 experts who have diverse experience in the related field. Later, a questionnaire survey was designed to measure the severity of each problem/drawback and the data was collected from 15 construction practitioners. The data were then analyzed using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method to measure the severities of problems seen in Turkish BAS. Then, the problems were prioritized based on their severities. At the final step, sensitivity analysis was conducted to measure the robustness and reliability of the results derived from the FAHP method. Results revealed that problems such as “Lack of practical knowledge of technical staff”, “Absence of site supervisor at the site” “Political pressure” and “Neglecting technical specifications and procedures” were determined as the most severe problems that need urgent attention of decision-makers. It is highly believed that this study will guide decision-makers for the improvement of existing legislation. Additionally, it is also believed that practitioners will take necessary precautions beforehand by using the outputs of this study.
土耳其建筑审计系统问题严重程度评价:模糊层次分析法
建筑审计制度(BAS)由于其种种弊端经常受到研究人员、建筑从业人员和专业商会的批评。然而,现有的研究并没有全面调查土耳其BAS中出现的问题。由于决策者对系统的缺点知之甚少,他们几乎无法制定新的策略来提高其有效性和效率。为了弥补这一差距,本研究旨在确定土耳其建筑审计系统(BAS)实施中的缺陷。此外,还确定了每项退税的严重程度,以进一步为政策制定者和非政府组织提供全面指导。首先,进行了广泛的文献综述,以确定土耳其BAS的问题。确定的问题随后通过12名在相关领域具有不同经验的专家参加的焦点小组讨论(FGD)会议加以验证。随后,设计了一份问卷调查来衡量每个问题/缺点的严重程度,并收集了15名建筑从业人员的数据。然后使用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)对数据进行分析,以衡量土耳其BAS中所见问题的严重程度。然后,根据问题的严重程度对问题进行优先排序。在最后一步,进行敏感性分析,以衡量从FAHP方法得出的结果的稳健性和可靠性。结果表明,“技术人员缺乏实践知识”、“现场监督人员缺位”、“政治压力”和“忽视技术规范和程序”等问题是最需要决策者迫切关注的问题。相信本研究将指导决策者完善现行立法。此外,我们也相信,从业者将采取必要的预防措施,事先使用本研究的输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信