Are higher-order factors useful in pricing the cross-section of hedge fund returns?

Caio Almeida, E. Fang
{"title":"Are higher-order factors useful in pricing the cross-section of hedge\n fund returns?","authors":"Caio Almeida, E. Fang","doi":"10.12660/RBFIN.V17N2.2019.78017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates hedge funds’ exposures to various risk factors\n across different investment strategies through models with both linear and\n second-order factors. Despite many efforts to search for the set of risk\n factors that best explains cross-sectional hedge fund returns, no consensus\n has been reached. In this study, we extend the analysis from an augmented\n linear model based on Fama and French (1993) and Fung and Hsieh (2001) to\n second-order models that include all quadratic and interaction terms by\n adopting a novel multistep strategy that combines the variable selection\n capabilities of the lasso regression with the Fama-MacBeth (1973) two-step\n method. We find that several quadratic and interaction terms are\n statistically significant for some strategies; however, there is no evidence\n that the second-order models have more overall explanatory or predictive\n power than the linear model. Moreover, while both the linear and\n second-order models perform well for directional funds, missing factors may\n still remain for semidirectional funds.","PeriodicalId":152637,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Review of Finance","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/RBFIN.V17N2.2019.78017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates hedge funds’ exposures to various risk factors across different investment strategies through models with both linear and second-order factors. Despite many efforts to search for the set of risk factors that best explains cross-sectional hedge fund returns, no consensus has been reached. In this study, we extend the analysis from an augmented linear model based on Fama and French (1993) and Fung and Hsieh (2001) to second-order models that include all quadratic and interaction terms by adopting a novel multistep strategy that combines the variable selection capabilities of the lasso regression with the Fama-MacBeth (1973) two-step method. We find that several quadratic and interaction terms are statistically significant for some strategies; however, there is no evidence that the second-order models have more overall explanatory or predictive power than the linear model. Moreover, while both the linear and second-order models perform well for directional funds, missing factors may still remain for semidirectional funds.
高阶因子对对冲基金收益横截面的定价有用吗?
本文通过线性和二阶因素模型研究了对冲基金在不同投资策略下的风险敞口。尽管人们努力寻找最能解释横截面对冲基金回报的一系列风险因素,但尚未达成共识。在本研究中,我们将基于Fama和French(1993)以及Fung和Hsieh(2001)的增强线性模型的分析扩展到二阶模型,该二阶模型包括所有二次项和相互作用项,采用了一种新的多步策略,该策略将lasso回归的变量选择能力与Fama- macbeth(1973)两步方法相结合。我们发现一些策略的二次项和交互项具有统计显著性;然而,没有证据表明二阶模型比线性模型具有更全面的解释或预测能力。此外,虽然线性和二阶模型对定向基金都表现良好,但对半定向基金可能仍然存在缺失因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信