Considerations When Performing an Epidural Blood Patch on a Patient Anticoagulated with Low Molecular Weight Heparin: A Case Report

Jessica S. Sheeran, Samuel J. MacCormick, L. Kohan
{"title":"Considerations When Performing an Epidural Blood Patch on a Patient Anticoagulated with Low Molecular Weight Heparin: A Case Report","authors":"Jessica S. Sheeran, Samuel J. MacCormick, L. Kohan","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patch (EBP) procedure timing can be difficult in patients on anticoagulant therapy when balancing the goals of EBP, safety, and efficacy. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a patient on anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) who presented for a planned cesarean section which was complicated by dural puncture with a Tuohy needle during combined spinal-epidural placement. She then developed a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after restarting LMWH. After holding LMWH for 18 hours, an EBP was placed resulting in symptomatic relief; LMWH was restarted 12 hours later. However, her symptoms returned and EBP was repeated 78 hours after the initial blood patch, again with relief of symptoms. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of EBP procedure timing in the setting of LMWH administration in order to maximize efficacy while minimizing neuraxial hematoma and venous thromboembolism risk. KEY WORDS: Epidural blood patch, postdural puncture headache, anticoagulation, efficacy, timing","PeriodicalId":122753,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine Case Reports","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patch (EBP) procedure timing can be difficult in patients on anticoagulant therapy when balancing the goals of EBP, safety, and efficacy. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a patient on anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) who presented for a planned cesarean section which was complicated by dural puncture with a Tuohy needle during combined spinal-epidural placement. She then developed a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after restarting LMWH. After holding LMWH for 18 hours, an EBP was placed resulting in symptomatic relief; LMWH was restarted 12 hours later. However, her symptoms returned and EBP was repeated 78 hours after the initial blood patch, again with relief of symptoms. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of EBP procedure timing in the setting of LMWH administration in order to maximize efficacy while minimizing neuraxial hematoma and venous thromboembolism risk. KEY WORDS: Epidural blood patch, postdural puncture headache, anticoagulation, efficacy, timing
应用低分子肝素抗凝患者硬膜外补血的注意事项:1例报告
背景:在接受抗凝治疗的患者中,在平衡EBP、安全性和有效性的目标时,硬膜外补血(EBP)手术的时机可能是困难的。病例报告:我们提出的情况下,患者抗凝治疗低分子肝素(LMWH)谁提出了一个计划剖宫产,这是复杂的硬脊膜外联合放置时硬脊膜穿刺Tuohy针。在重新启动低分子肝素后,她出现了硬脊膜穿刺性头痛(PDPH)。在低分子肝素保持18小时后,放置EBP导致症状缓解;12小时后LMWH重新启动。然而,她的症状又出现了,在初次补血78小时后再次进行EBP检查,症状再次缓解。结论:本病例强调了低分子肝素给药时EBP手术时机的重要性,以最大限度地提高疗效,同时最大限度地降低神经轴血肿和静脉血栓栓塞的风险。关键词:硬膜外血贴,硬膜后穿刺头痛,抗凝,疗效,时机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信