Why Great Ideas Are Often Overlooked

E. Rietzschel, B. Nijstad, W. Stroebe
{"title":"Why Great Ideas Are Often Overlooked","authors":"E. Rietzschel, B. Nijstad, W. Stroebe","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190648077.013.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group creativity is far more than the generation of ideas: Ultimately, creative ideas must be recognized, valued, and selected. This chapter reviews and theoretically analyzes the relevant literature on the recognition, evaluation, and selection of creative ideas in groups. In doing so, it explains that both idea evaluation and idea selection show substantial room for improvement, with idea selection being especially problematic. The chapter argues that the underlying problem in effective idea evaluation and selection is the tension between originality and feasibility, and that highly original ideas tend to be disliked or rejected because they are perceived to be risky and unfeasible. Situational or personal factors that make implementation or feasibility concerns more salient will therefore hinder creative idea selection. After discussing the literature, the chapter addresses some possible solutions and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":257448,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190648077.013.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Group creativity is far more than the generation of ideas: Ultimately, creative ideas must be recognized, valued, and selected. This chapter reviews and theoretically analyzes the relevant literature on the recognition, evaluation, and selection of creative ideas in groups. In doing so, it explains that both idea evaluation and idea selection show substantial room for improvement, with idea selection being especially problematic. The chapter argues that the underlying problem in effective idea evaluation and selection is the tension between originality and feasibility, and that highly original ideas tend to be disliked or rejected because they are perceived to be risky and unfeasible. Situational or personal factors that make implementation or feasibility concerns more salient will therefore hinder creative idea selection. After discussing the literature, the chapter addresses some possible solutions and directions for future research.
为什么伟大的想法经常被忽视
团队创造力远不止是产生想法:最终,创造性的想法必须得到认可、重视和选择。本章对群体创意识别、评价和选择的相关文献进行了综述和理论分析。在这样做的过程中,它解释了想法评估和想法选择都显示出很大的改进空间,其中想法选择尤其成问题。本章认为,有效的想法评估和选择的潜在问题是原创性和可行性之间的紧张关系,高度原创的想法往往不受欢迎或拒绝,因为它们被认为是有风险和不可行的。情境或个人因素使执行或可行性问题更加突出,因此会阻碍创造性想法的选择。在讨论了文献之后,本章提出了一些可能的解决方案和未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信