Does General Solicitation Improve Access to Capital for Small Businesses? Evidence from the JOBS Act

Anup Agrawal, Yuree Lim
{"title":"Does General Solicitation Improve Access to Capital for Small Businesses? Evidence from the JOBS Act","authors":"Anup Agrawal, Yuree Lim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3602183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine whether Title II of the JOBS Act increases small firms’ access to capital. Title II allows firms to sell securities via general solicitations to accredited investors. We find that firms that offer securities via general solicitation tend to be of lower quality. After accounting for selection, we find that general solicitation offerings are less likely to succeed, and they raise lower amounts of capital than other offerings. Moreover, general solicitation offerings incur substantial brokerage costs to verify that investors are accredited under the Act. Our results imply the need to craft policies that induce better ways of signaling firm quality or more transparent approaches to reducing information asymmetry.","PeriodicalId":321552,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3602183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine whether Title II of the JOBS Act increases small firms’ access to capital. Title II allows firms to sell securities via general solicitations to accredited investors. We find that firms that offer securities via general solicitation tend to be of lower quality. After accounting for selection, we find that general solicitation offerings are less likely to succeed, and they raise lower amounts of capital than other offerings. Moreover, general solicitation offerings incur substantial brokerage costs to verify that investors are accredited under the Act. Our results imply the need to craft policies that induce better ways of signaling firm quality or more transparent approaches to reducing information asymmetry.
一般募集是否改善了小企业获得资金的途径?来自JOBS法案的证据
我们考察了《就业法案》第二章是否增加了小企业获得资本的渠道。第二章允许公司通过一般征求向合格投资者出售证券。我们发现,通过普遍征集提供证券的公司往往质量较低。在考虑了选择因素后,我们发现普通募集发行成功的可能性较小,募集的资金量也低于其他发行。此外,一般的询价发行会产生大量的经纪成本,以核实投资者是否根据该法案获得认可。我们的研究结果表明,需要制定政策,以诱导更好的方式表明公司质量或更透明的方法来减少信息不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信