A framework to generate fault-based behavior models for complex systems design

B. O’Halloran, D. Jensen, I. Tumer, T. Kurtoglu, R. Stone
{"title":"A framework to generate fault-based behavior models for complex systems design","authors":"B. O’Halloran, D. Jensen, I. Tumer, T. Kurtoglu, R. Stone","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault analysis has been identified as a crucial step during the design process. Any complex design problem requires careful consideration of fault modes, fault mechanisms, propagation of faults, etc. The verification and validation efforts in complex systems design can be improved by modeling faulty behavior. This can be done by using a library of pre-constructed faulty behavior models. Currently, a major limitation for modeling performance in complex systems design is that libraries only use nominal component behavior. Strictly using nominal behavior, as opposed to faulty behavior, leads to design uncertainty and poor verification and validation. In a reliability sense, the traditional method for dealing with uncertainty is to over-design the system. While this leads to a workable solution, it is not optimized in terms of design attributes and leads to wasted resources. This paper proposes an alternative method to capture faulty behavior by developing a framework to create component behavior models, with the goal of ultimately increasing design verification and validation during complex systems design. An example shows the implementation of the frictional wear fault mechanism for a gear component. While the results can be trivial for an individual component, the purpose of these models is to tackle complex systems design where the change in performance is measured at the system level.","PeriodicalId":189714,"journal":{"name":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Fault analysis has been identified as a crucial step during the design process. Any complex design problem requires careful consideration of fault modes, fault mechanisms, propagation of faults, etc. The verification and validation efforts in complex systems design can be improved by modeling faulty behavior. This can be done by using a library of pre-constructed faulty behavior models. Currently, a major limitation for modeling performance in complex systems design is that libraries only use nominal component behavior. Strictly using nominal behavior, as opposed to faulty behavior, leads to design uncertainty and poor verification and validation. In a reliability sense, the traditional method for dealing with uncertainty is to over-design the system. While this leads to a workable solution, it is not optimized in terms of design attributes and leads to wasted resources. This paper proposes an alternative method to capture faulty behavior by developing a framework to create component behavior models, with the goal of ultimately increasing design verification and validation during complex systems design. An example shows the implementation of the frictional wear fault mechanism for a gear component. While the results can be trivial for an individual component, the purpose of these models is to tackle complex systems design where the change in performance is measured at the system level.
为复杂系统设计生成基于故障的行为模型的框架
故障分析已被确定为设计过程中的关键步骤。任何复杂的设计问题都需要仔细考虑故障模式、故障机制、故障传播等问题。复杂系统设计中的验证和确认工作可以通过对故障行为进行建模来改进。这可以通过使用预先构建的错误行为模型库来完成。目前,复杂系统设计中建模性能的一个主要限制是库只使用名义组件行为。严格使用标称行为,而不是错误行为,会导致设计的不确定性和糟糕的验证和确认。在可靠性方面,处理不确定性的传统方法是对系统进行过度设计。虽然这导致了一个可行的解决方案,但它没有在设计属性方面进行优化,并导致资源浪费。本文提出了一种通过开发框架来创建组件行为模型来捕获错误行为的替代方法,其最终目标是在复杂系统设计期间增加设计验证和确认。给出了齿轮部件摩擦磨损故障机理的实现实例。虽然结果对于单个组件来说可能是微不足道的,但这些模型的目的是处理复杂的系统设计,其中性能变化是在系统级别度量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信