Correlative Analysis of Combined Machine Learning Classifiers on Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection Systems

Vamsi Udayakumar J, S. Roy, Prasad B. Honnavalli
{"title":"Correlative Analysis of Combined Machine Learning Classifiers on Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection Systems","authors":"Vamsi Udayakumar J, S. Roy, Prasad B. Honnavalli","doi":"10.1109/temsmet53515.2021.9768764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detailed study on the performance improvements brought about in intrusion detection by fusing the evidence from heterogeneous classifiers derived out of supervised Neural and Algorithmic models, which have been trained across datasets differing in size and attributes to filter anomalous data packets. Binary Classification models with varying Neural layers of distinct Deep Learning architectures along with diverse rule-based probabilistic and deterministic classifiers have been constructed to give a wide comprehension regarding the impact of each classifier on the efficacy of the other. Data samples have been extracted from each of the NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, and CICIDS-2017 datasets to simulate real-life data conducive to an extensive and non-biased packet stratification. Logical conjunction and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) have been availed as the combination and evaluation techniques respectively. The obtained results indicate that the Support Vector Machine and Gated Recurrent Unit ensemble shows the highest accuracy. Furthermore, Logistic Regression model coupled with Naïve Bayes is the most optimal combination with regards to the MCC score and detection time taken.","PeriodicalId":170546,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Technology, Engineering, Management for Societal impact using Marketing, Entrepreneurship and Talent (TEMSMET)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Technology, Engineering, Management for Societal impact using Marketing, Entrepreneurship and Talent (TEMSMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/temsmet53515.2021.9768764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A detailed study on the performance improvements brought about in intrusion detection by fusing the evidence from heterogeneous classifiers derived out of supervised Neural and Algorithmic models, which have been trained across datasets differing in size and attributes to filter anomalous data packets. Binary Classification models with varying Neural layers of distinct Deep Learning architectures along with diverse rule-based probabilistic and deterministic classifiers have been constructed to give a wide comprehension regarding the impact of each classifier on the efficacy of the other. Data samples have been extracted from each of the NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, and CICIDS-2017 datasets to simulate real-life data conducive to an extensive and non-biased packet stratification. Logical conjunction and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) have been availed as the combination and evaluation techniques respectively. The obtained results indicate that the Support Vector Machine and Gated Recurrent Unit ensemble shows the highest accuracy. Furthermore, Logistic Regression model coupled with Naïve Bayes is the most optimal combination with regards to the MCC score and detection time taken.
基于异常的入侵检测系统中组合机器学习分类器的相关性分析
详细研究了通过融合来自监督神经和算法模型的异构分类器的证据所带来的入侵检测性能改进,这些分类器在不同大小和属性的数据集上进行了训练,以过滤异常数据包。二元分类模型具有不同深度学习架构的不同神经层以及不同基于规则的概率和确定性分类器,以广泛理解每个分类器对另一个分类器功效的影响。从NSL-KDD、UNSW-NB15和CICIDS-2017数据集中提取数据样本,模拟真实数据,有利于广泛和无偏见的分组分层。逻辑连接法和马修斯相关系数(MCC)分别作为组合和评价技术。实验结果表明,支持向量机和门控循环单元组合方法具有最高的精度。在MCC评分和检测时间方面,Logistic回归模型与Naïve贝叶斯相结合是最优的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信