MENTAL HEALTH IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: PREDICTIVE ROLE OF GROWTH AND SELF-PROTECTION VALUES

Agnieszka Franczok Kuczmowska
{"title":"MENTAL HEALTH IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: PREDICTIVE ROLE OF GROWTH AND SELF-PROTECTION VALUES","authors":"Agnieszka Franczok Kuczmowska","doi":"10.33422/8HPS.2018.10.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early adulthood is a developmental stage during which several mental health issues are noted. The same time in the context of multiple life options offered by the modern world and no clear evaluation criteria, early adults value hierarchy is especially valuable area of research. In the light of research on association between values and subjective well-being, the relationship between values and mental health still needs to be established. The aim of the study was to transfer Schwartz value theory to health psychology area and verify whether Growth values and Self-Protection values correlate with and predict mental health in depression, anxiety and resilience in polish population of early adults. Participants completed Portrait Value Questionnaire PVQ40, General Health Questionnaire GHQ-12 and Brief Resilience Scale BRS. The univariate and multivariate linear regression were employed in order to verify hypothesis. Results indicate that the Growth values and the Self-Protection values predict mental health in early adulthood. Conformity increases depression and decreases resilience, Self-Direction decreases depression and increases resilience, Tradition increases depression, while Achievement and Stimulation increase resilience. In the light of given results, Self-Direction and Conformity presents the greatest relation to mental health in both positive and negative aspects. Discussion, study limitations, and suggestions for further research were stated. ( F (1,110) = 4.23. p < .01, R = .32) Conformity (β = .114, p > .05), Tradition (β = .172, p > .05), and Self-Direction (β = -.203, p < .05), predict 10.5% of Depression. Given results indicate that out of personal values Self-Direction predicts Depression to the greatest extent. The same time Self-Direction seems to perform potential protective factor function. Security, Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Universalism and Benevolence do not significantly predict Depression. Anxiety. The results of univariate regression indicate that none of the values: Conformity, Tradition, Security, Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, SelfDirection, Universalism, Benevolence predict Anxiety level. values Conformity F (1,110) = p .01, β = -.238), Achievement ( F (1,110) = 6.609, p < .01, β = .238 ), Stimulation ( F (1,110) = 5.329, p < .05, β = .215) and Self-Direction ( F (1,110) = 7.477, p < .01, β = .252). Predictive Power of these individual values remains weak as each: Conformity, Achievement and Self-Direction predicts 6% while Stimulation predicts 5% of Resilience. The higher Conformity, the lower Resilience. Conversely, the higher Achievement, Stimulation and Self-Direction, the higher Resilience. In multivariate linear regression ( F (4,107) = 5.048, p ≤ .001, R = .40) Conformity (β = -.264, p < .01), Achievement (β = .227, p < .05), Self-Direction (β = .156, p > .05) and Stimulation (β = .012, p > .05) predict 16% of Resilience. results Results indicate that the higher individually measured Growth values: SelfDirection, Achievement and Stimulation, the greater is resilience level. The same time the higher Self-Protection value: Conformity, the lower is resilience in early adults. Thus hypothesis has been confirmed. Given results are consistent with previous findings on Self-Direction as a predictor of resilience (Maercker, Zhang, Gao, Kochetkov, Lu, Sang, Yang, Schneider & Margraf, 2015). Out of significant values, Conformity seems to perform potential risk factor function and Achievement seems to perform the greatest protective factor function.","PeriodicalId":340030,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference On Humanities, Psychology and Social Science","volume":"95 Suppl B 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference On Humanities, Psychology and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/8HPS.2018.10.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early adulthood is a developmental stage during which several mental health issues are noted. The same time in the context of multiple life options offered by the modern world and no clear evaluation criteria, early adults value hierarchy is especially valuable area of research. In the light of research on association between values and subjective well-being, the relationship between values and mental health still needs to be established. The aim of the study was to transfer Schwartz value theory to health psychology area and verify whether Growth values and Self-Protection values correlate with and predict mental health in depression, anxiety and resilience in polish population of early adults. Participants completed Portrait Value Questionnaire PVQ40, General Health Questionnaire GHQ-12 and Brief Resilience Scale BRS. The univariate and multivariate linear regression were employed in order to verify hypothesis. Results indicate that the Growth values and the Self-Protection values predict mental health in early adulthood. Conformity increases depression and decreases resilience, Self-Direction decreases depression and increases resilience, Tradition increases depression, while Achievement and Stimulation increase resilience. In the light of given results, Self-Direction and Conformity presents the greatest relation to mental health in both positive and negative aspects. Discussion, study limitations, and suggestions for further research were stated. ( F (1,110) = 4.23. p < .01, R = .32) Conformity (β = .114, p > .05), Tradition (β = .172, p > .05), and Self-Direction (β = -.203, p < .05), predict 10.5% of Depression. Given results indicate that out of personal values Self-Direction predicts Depression to the greatest extent. The same time Self-Direction seems to perform potential protective factor function. Security, Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Universalism and Benevolence do not significantly predict Depression. Anxiety. The results of univariate regression indicate that none of the values: Conformity, Tradition, Security, Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, SelfDirection, Universalism, Benevolence predict Anxiety level. values Conformity F (1,110) = p .01, β = -.238), Achievement ( F (1,110) = 6.609, p < .01, β = .238 ), Stimulation ( F (1,110) = 5.329, p < .05, β = .215) and Self-Direction ( F (1,110) = 7.477, p < .01, β = .252). Predictive Power of these individual values remains weak as each: Conformity, Achievement and Self-Direction predicts 6% while Stimulation predicts 5% of Resilience. The higher Conformity, the lower Resilience. Conversely, the higher Achievement, Stimulation and Self-Direction, the higher Resilience. In multivariate linear regression ( F (4,107) = 5.048, p ≤ .001, R = .40) Conformity (β = -.264, p < .01), Achievement (β = .227, p < .05), Self-Direction (β = .156, p > .05) and Stimulation (β = .012, p > .05) predict 16% of Resilience. results Results indicate that the higher individually measured Growth values: SelfDirection, Achievement and Stimulation, the greater is resilience level. The same time the higher Self-Protection value: Conformity, the lower is resilience in early adults. Thus hypothesis has been confirmed. Given results are consistent with previous findings on Self-Direction as a predictor of resilience (Maercker, Zhang, Gao, Kochetkov, Lu, Sang, Yang, Schneider & Margraf, 2015). Out of significant values, Conformity seems to perform potential risk factor function and Achievement seems to perform the greatest protective factor function.
成年早期心理健康:成长和自我保护价值观的预测作用
成年早期是一个发展阶段,在此期间注意到一些心理健康问题。同时,在现代社会提供的多种生活选择和没有明确的评价标准的背景下,早期成人的价值层次是特别有价值的研究领域。从价值观与主观幸福感关系的研究来看,价值观与心理健康的关系还有待建立。本研究旨在将Schwartz价值理论引入健康心理学领域,验证成长价值和自我保护价值是否与波兰早期成年人群抑郁、焦虑和心理弹性相关并预测其心理健康状况。参与者完成了肖像价值问卷PVQ40、一般健康问卷GHQ-12和心理弹性简短量表BRS。采用单变量和多元线性回归对假设进行验证。结果表明,成长价值观和自我保护价值观对成年早期心理健康状况有预测作用。顺从会增加抑郁,降低适应能力,自我指导会减少抑郁,增加适应能力,传统会增加抑郁,而成就和刺激会增加适应能力。根据所给出的结果,自我指导和从众在积极和消极方面都与心理健康表现出最大的关系。讨论,研究的局限性和进一步研究的建议。(f(1,110) = 4.23。p < 0.01, R = .32),顺从(β = .114, p > .05),传统(β = .172, p > .05),自我导向(β = -。203, p < 0.05),预测10.5%的抑郁症。结果表明,个人价值观外的自我导向对抑郁的预测作用最大。同时,自我导向似乎具有潜在的保护因子功能。安全感、权力、成就、享乐主义、刺激、普遍主义和仁爱对抑郁无显著预测作用。焦虑。单变量回归结果显示,从众、传统、安全、权力、成就、享乐主义、刺激、自我导向、普遍主义、仁慈等价值观均不能预测焦虑水平。服从F (1,110) = p < 0.01, β = - 0.238)、成就(F (1,110) = 6.609, p < 0.01, β = 0.238)、激励(F (1,110) = 5.329, p < 0.05, β = 0.215)和自我导向(F (1,110) = 7.477, p < 0.01, β = 0.252)。这些个体价值观的预测能力仍然很弱:顺从、成就和自我导向预测6%,而刺激预测5%的弹性。一致性越高,适应力越低。反之,成就、激励和自我导向越高,心理弹性越高。多元线性回归(F (4107) = 5.048, p≤0.001,R = 0.40)。264, p < 0.01),成就(β = .227, p < 0.05),自我导向(β = .156, p > 0.05)和刺激(β = .012, p > 0.05)预测16%的弹性。结果自我导向、成就和激励的个体成长值越高,心理弹性水平越高。同时,自我保护值越高,成人早期适应力越低。这一假设得到了证实。给定的结果与先前关于自我指导作为弹性预测因子的研究结果一致(Maercker, Zhang, Gao, Kochetkov, Lu, Sang, Yang, Schneider & Margraf, 2015)。在显著性价值观中,从众表现出潜在的风险因素功能,成就表现出最大的保护因素功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信