Not as Easy as E-Mail: Tutors' Perspective of an Online Assignment Submission System

Orit Naor-Elaiza, N. Geri
{"title":"Not as Easy as E-Mail: Tutors' Perspective of an Online Assignment Submission System","authors":"Orit Naor-Elaiza, N. Geri","doi":"10.28945/82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continued use of a system beyond initial adoption is one of the most challenging issues in practice and research. This study examines the continued use of an online assignment submission system, which was implemented in a blended distance learning university. The system has two main groups of users: the students who may choose between submitting their work through the system or via regular mail, and the tutors who have to check these assignments. This paper analyzes the system’s continued use from the tutor’s perspective. After nine years of implementation, about half of the assignments were submitted via the system. The research model, which is based mainly on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and diffusion of innovation theory, has been empirically examined with data collected via a Web survey from 89 tutors. Behavioral intention to use the system was influenced mainly by its compatibility with the assignment checking process, its perceived usefulness, its real value, and tutors’ attitude toward new technologies. The findings suggest that the system is not compatible with the checking process of those tutors who are reluctant to use it.","PeriodicalId":104467,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Continued use of a system beyond initial adoption is one of the most challenging issues in practice and research. This study examines the continued use of an online assignment submission system, which was implemented in a blended distance learning university. The system has two main groups of users: the students who may choose between submitting their work through the system or via regular mail, and the tutors who have to check these assignments. This paper analyzes the system’s continued use from the tutor’s perspective. After nine years of implementation, about half of the assignments were submitted via the system. The research model, which is based mainly on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and diffusion of innovation theory, has been empirically examined with data collected via a Web survey from 89 tutors. Behavioral intention to use the system was influenced mainly by its compatibility with the assignment checking process, its perceived usefulness, its real value, and tutors’ attitude toward new technologies. The findings suggest that the system is not compatible with the checking process of those tutors who are reluctant to use it.
不像电子邮件那么容易:导师对在线作业提交系统的看法
在最初采用系统之后继续使用系统是实践和研究中最具挑战性的问题之一。本研究考察了在线作业提交系统的持续使用,该系统在一所混合式远程学习大学中实施。该系统主要有两组用户:学生可以选择通过系统或通过普通邮件提交作业,而导师必须检查这些作业。本文从教师的角度分析了该系统的持续使用。经过九年的实施,大约一半的作业是通过该系统提交的。研究模型主要基于技术接受模型(TAM)和创新扩散理论,并通过对89名教师的网络调查数据进行实证检验。使用系统的行为意愿主要受其与作业检查过程的兼容性、感知有用性、实际价值和教师对新技术的态度的影响。调查结果表明,该系统与那些不愿使用它的教师的检查过程不兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信