{"title":"Comparative psychiatric morbidity among three groups of health professionals in a Nigerian tertiary health institution.","authors":"A. D. Yussuf","doi":"10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Because health professionals have different job schedules and commitments,\nthey may be differentially susceptible to developing psychological health problems under\nsimilar work environment.\nAims The present study compared the levels of morbidity in 3 groups of health\nprofessionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) identified as having probable\npsychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 and above on 30-item GHQ), to ascertain the most\nsusceptible to psychiatric morbidity among these 3 groups of health professionals, and the\npossible risk factors for such susceptibility.\nMethod This was a cross-sectional survey involving 563 health professionals\n(Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) in the employ of University of Ilorin Teaching\nHospital (UITH). Subjects were asked to respond to 2 questionnaires (sociodemographic/\nwork-related, and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)).\nData of respondents with probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 or more on the\nGHQ) were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 11, to generate frequency\ndistributions and cross tabulation. Chi square figures, odd ratios, and relative risk were\ncalculated; The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.\nResults The overall response rate was 71.8% (404/563): by groups it was 69.2% (54/78)\nfor consultants, 70% (70/100) for residents, and 72.7% (280/385) for nurses. The mean\nscores on the 30-item GHQ were 1.76 (SD=2.8), 2.76 (SD=3.8), and 1.58 (SD=2.1) for\nconsultants, residents, and the nurses respectively. The residents significantly scored\nhigher than the consultants or nurses on the\n30-item GHQ (F =5.99, p=0.003).\nTen (18.5%), 18 (25.7%), and 50 (17.9%) with mean scores of 6.7 (SD=1.6), 7.7\n(SD=4.7), and 5.2 (SD=2.1) of consultants, residents, and nurses respectively, scored 4 or\nmore on the 30-item GHQ, and were considered as having probable psychiatric morbidity\n(F=5.7, p=0.005).\nApart from other risk factors such as relationships with patients' relatives, job experience,\nand unsatisfactory remunerations, the negative effect of work on the residents' family\nmade them about 18 times more susceptible to developing psychiatric morbidity than\nconsultants or nurses while female gender made the nurses about 16 times more\nsusceptible than any of the other 2 professionals.\nConclusion The author therefore advocates establishment of a comprehensive stress\nmanagement program in the health institutions, mentoring program to provide\nprofessional and emotional support to residents and other hospital staff, and collaboration\nwith the Behavioural Sciences (Psychiatric) department, as well as adequate\nstaffing/equipping of this department. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37","PeriodicalId":422969,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background Because health professionals have different job schedules and commitments,
they may be differentially susceptible to developing psychological health problems under
similar work environment.
Aims The present study compared the levels of morbidity in 3 groups of health
professionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) identified as having probable
psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 and above on 30-item GHQ), to ascertain the most
susceptible to psychiatric morbidity among these 3 groups of health professionals, and the
possible risk factors for such susceptibility.
Method This was a cross-sectional survey involving 563 health professionals
(Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) in the employ of University of Ilorin Teaching
Hospital (UITH). Subjects were asked to respond to 2 questionnaires (sociodemographic/
work-related, and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)).
Data of respondents with probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 or more on the
GHQ) were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 11, to generate frequency
distributions and cross tabulation. Chi square figures, odd ratios, and relative risk were
calculated; The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.
Results The overall response rate was 71.8% (404/563): by groups it was 69.2% (54/78)
for consultants, 70% (70/100) for residents, and 72.7% (280/385) for nurses. The mean
scores on the 30-item GHQ were 1.76 (SD=2.8), 2.76 (SD=3.8), and 1.58 (SD=2.1) for
consultants, residents, and the nurses respectively. The residents significantly scored
higher than the consultants or nurses on the
30-item GHQ (F =5.99, p=0.003).
Ten (18.5%), 18 (25.7%), and 50 (17.9%) with mean scores of 6.7 (SD=1.6), 7.7
(SD=4.7), and 5.2 (SD=2.1) of consultants, residents, and nurses respectively, scored 4 or
more on the 30-item GHQ, and were considered as having probable psychiatric morbidity
(F=5.7, p=0.005).
Apart from other risk factors such as relationships with patients' relatives, job experience,
and unsatisfactory remunerations, the negative effect of work on the residents' family
made them about 18 times more susceptible to developing psychiatric morbidity than
consultants or nurses while female gender made the nurses about 16 times more
susceptible than any of the other 2 professionals.
Conclusion The author therefore advocates establishment of a comprehensive stress
management program in the health institutions, mentoring program to provide
professional and emotional support to residents and other hospital staff, and collaboration
with the Behavioural Sciences (Psychiatric) department, as well as adequate
staffing/equipping of this department. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37
背景:由于卫生专业人员有不同的工作时间表和承诺,他们可能在相似的工作环境中不同地容易产生心理健康问题。目的本研究比较三组被确定为可能有精神疾病的卫生专业人员(咨询员、住院医师和护士)(即在30项GHQ中得分为4分及以上)的发病率水平,以确定这三组卫生专业人员中最容易发生精神疾病的人,以及这种易感性的可能危险因素。方法采用横断面调查方法,对伊洛林大学教学医院563名卫生专业人员(会诊医师、住院医师和护士)进行调查。受试者被要求回答2份问卷(社会人口学/工作相关问卷和30项一般健康问卷(GHQ-30))。使用SPSS for Windows version 11对可能有精神疾病(即ghq得分在4分或以上)的受访者数据进行分析,生成频率分布和交叉表。重新计算卡方数据、奇比和相对风险;统计学显著性水平设为5%。结果总有效率为71.8%(404/563),分组中,会诊医生的总有效率为69.2%(54/78),住院医生的总有效率为70%(70/100),护士的总有效率为72.7%(280/385)。咨询医师、住院医师和护士的GHQ均值分别为1.76 (SD=2.8)、2.76 (SD=3.8)和1.58 (SD=2.1)。住院医师在30项GHQ上的得分显著高于咨询医师或护士(F =5.99, p=0.003)。平均得分6.7 (SD=1.6)、7.7(SD=4.7)和5.2 (SD=2.1)的咨询师、住院医师和护士分别有10人(18.5%)、18人(25.7%)和50人(17.9%)在30项GHQ中得分在4分及以上,被认为可能存在精神疾病(F=5.7, p=0.005)。除去与病人亲属的关系、工作经验和不满意的报酬等其他风险因素外,工作对住院医生家庭的负面影响使他们比咨询师或护士更容易发生精神疾病,而女性使护士比其他两种专业人员更容易发生精神疾病,其易感性约为18倍。因此,作者主张在卫生机构建立一个全面的压力管理计划,指导计划,为居民和其他医院工作人员提供专业和情感支持,并与行为科学(精神科)部门合作,以及该部门的适当人员/设备。尼日利亚精神病学杂志Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37