Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural Tanzania

Geofrey Charles, Sixtus Otieno, M. Kimaro, Elisante Heriel, Tuntufye Mwakasisi, Johnson Mganga
{"title":"Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural Tanzania","authors":"Geofrey Charles, Sixtus Otieno, M. Kimaro, Elisante Heriel, Tuntufye Mwakasisi, Johnson Mganga","doi":"10.59557/kavham44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis study examines the determinants of multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Poverty is still a challenge in Tanzania, particularly in rural areas, since its incidence rate of decrease is slower than in urban areas. The study used binary logistic regression to identify the key determinants of multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Both the Alkire-Foster (2011) counting and binary logistic regression methods were applied to estimate the Multidimensional Poverty Index and determinants of multidimensional poverty respectively. The research utilized data that were already collected by the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey in 2017. The Alkire and Foster estimates, showed that, the majority of the households living in rural Tanzania (74.43 percent) were poor. Additionally, the findings showed that, the dimension of living standard (56.6%) contributes more to the total MPI, followed by health (23.2) and education (20.2%). Binary logit regression model estimates showed that, the factors being studied were proven to be statistically significant determinants that have an impact on multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Moreover, female-headed households were 1.22 times more likely to be multi-dimensionally poor compared to male-headed households at the 5% level of significance. The findings reveal that age, education levels and married decrease the probability of being poor. Similarly, the model revealed that, people who use family planning are less likely to be poor (odd ratio, 0.79). This study has important policy implications for reducing multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. The government should prioritize improving access to basic amenities, housing, and infrastructure, and promote education and family planning services. Gender-sensitive policies and programs are also needed to address gender inequalities in rural Tanzania. For example, the government should invest in rural infrastructure development programs, such as the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Programme, which aims to provide safe water and sanitation facilities to rural communities. \n \n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":127679,"journal":{"name":"RPJ: Rural Planning Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RPJ: Rural Planning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59557/kavham44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Poverty is still a challenge in Tanzania, particularly in rural areas, since its incidence rate of decrease is slower than in urban areas. The study used binary logistic regression to identify the key determinants of multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Both the Alkire-Foster (2011) counting and binary logistic regression methods were applied to estimate the Multidimensional Poverty Index and determinants of multidimensional poverty respectively. The research utilized data that were already collected by the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey in 2017. The Alkire and Foster estimates, showed that, the majority of the households living in rural Tanzania (74.43 percent) were poor. Additionally, the findings showed that, the dimension of living standard (56.6%) contributes more to the total MPI, followed by health (23.2) and education (20.2%). Binary logit regression model estimates showed that, the factors being studied were proven to be statistically significant determinants that have an impact on multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. Moreover, female-headed households were 1.22 times more likely to be multi-dimensionally poor compared to male-headed households at the 5% level of significance. The findings reveal that age, education levels and married decrease the probability of being poor. Similarly, the model revealed that, people who use family planning are less likely to be poor (odd ratio, 0.79). This study has important policy implications for reducing multidimensional poverty in rural Tanzania. The government should prioritize improving access to basic amenities, housing, and infrastructure, and promote education and family planning services. Gender-sensitive policies and programs are also needed to address gender inequalities in rural Tanzania. For example, the government should invest in rural infrastructure development programs, such as the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Programme, which aims to provide safe water and sanitation facilities to rural communities.  
坦桑尼亚农村多维贫困的决定因素
本研究考察了坦桑尼亚农村多维贫困的决定因素。贫穷在坦桑尼亚仍然是一个挑战,特别是在农村地区,因为其发生率下降的速度比城市地区慢。该研究使用二元逻辑回归来确定坦桑尼亚农村多维贫困的关键决定因素。采用Alkire-Foster(2011)计数和二元逻辑回归方法分别估算了多维贫困指数和多维贫困的决定因素。该研究利用了2017年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查已经收集的数据。阿尔凯尔和福斯特的估计表明,生活在坦桑尼亚农村的大多数家庭(74.43%)是贫困的。此外,研究结果表明,生活水平维度对总MPI的贡献最大(56.6%),其次是健康(23.2)和教育(20.2%)。二元logit回归模型估计表明,所研究的因素已被证明是影响坦桑尼亚农村多维贫困的统计上显著的决定因素。此外,在5%显著性水平上,女性户主家庭的多维贫困可能性是男性户主家庭的1.22倍。研究结果显示,年龄、教育水平和婚姻状况会降低贫穷的可能性。同样,该模型显示,实行计划生育的人不太可能贫穷(奇数比,0.79)。这项研究对减少坦桑尼亚农村的多维贫困具有重要的政策意义。政府应优先改善基本设施、住房和基础设施,并促进教育和计划生育服务。还需要制定对性别问题敏感的政策和方案,以解决坦桑尼亚农村的性别不平等问题。例如,政府应投资农村基础设施发展项目,如农村供水和卫生项目,旨在为农村社区提供安全用水和卫生设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信