Contributions of SFMEA to requirements analysis

R. Lutz, R. M. Woodhouse
{"title":"Contributions of SFMEA to requirements analysis","authors":"R. Lutz, R. M. Woodhouse","doi":"10.1109/ICRE.1996.491428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experience report describes the lessons learned from the use of software failure modes and effects analysis (SFMEA) for requirements analysis of critical spacecraft software. The SFMEA process was found to be successful in identifying some ambiguous, inconsistent, and missing requirements. More importantly, the SFMEA process, followed by a backward analysis somewhat similar to fault tree analysis (FTA), identified four significant, unresolved requirements issues. These issues involved complex system interfaces and unanticipated dependencies. Our results challenge some current views on the limitations of SFMEA and suggest that recent efforts by researchers to integrate SFMEA with a broader FTA approach have merit.","PeriodicalId":152956,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The experience report describes the lessons learned from the use of software failure modes and effects analysis (SFMEA) for requirements analysis of critical spacecraft software. The SFMEA process was found to be successful in identifying some ambiguous, inconsistent, and missing requirements. More importantly, the SFMEA process, followed by a backward analysis somewhat similar to fault tree analysis (FTA), identified four significant, unresolved requirements issues. These issues involved complex system interfaces and unanticipated dependencies. Our results challenge some current views on the limitations of SFMEA and suggest that recent efforts by researchers to integrate SFMEA with a broader FTA approach have merit.
SFMEA对需求分析的贡献
经验报告描述了从使用软件故障模式和影响分析(SFMEA)对关键航天器软件进行需求分析中吸取的教训。发现SFMEA过程在识别一些不明确、不一致和缺失的需求方面是成功的。更重要的是,SFMEA过程,随后是类似于故障树分析(FTA)的反向分析,确定了四个重要的、未解决的需求问题。这些问题涉及复杂的系统接口和未预料到的依赖关系。我们的研究结果挑战了目前关于SFMEA局限性的一些观点,并表明最近研究人员将SFMEA与更广泛的FTA方法相结合的努力是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信