Better bottom line through lower component stress

N. Bidokhti
{"title":"Better bottom line through lower component stress","authors":"N. Bidokhti","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the value of having a methodology and capability to de-risk the design from stress de-rating point of view and how to improve the bottom line by following and building enough margins in the design. As designs are becoming more complex and development time is getting shorter, the chance of designing overstressed components and introducing schematic connectivity errors increases significantly which could lead to higher number of failures. This scenario is a one of typical cases where the overall product bottom line is impacted. Electronic assemblies are utilizing complex circuitry with smarter and denser ICs with more than 1000 pins. Due to sophisticated features and requirements of new designs, power dissipation and temperatures are increasing that jeopardizes the design reliability and integrity for mission critical systems. In addition to lack of acceptable product performance, mission critical and non-critical products will experience higher number of returns where it directly impacts customer confidence and cost of ownership. The challenge for today's reliability and design engineers is to perform an analysis in a timely manner at the schematic level before the first prototype to identify overstressed components and pins to prevent hardware re-spin. The intent if this paper is to demonstrate methods that should be implemented during the design phase of electronic boards, which will help the designer and the reliability analyst to detect components with high operational stress. The stress level can be power, voltage, current or temperature. Through this technique, product time to market will be reduced and decreases the risk of hardware failures during product operation. The analysis will provide best rules for schematic modeling, stress analysis and the importance of de-rating standard in a design. The paper will include the results of more than 20 analysis performed utilizing the recommended best practices and how many re-spins were prevented. This analysis can be performed on any types of components such as analog, digital and RF.","PeriodicalId":189714,"journal":{"name":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the value of having a methodology and capability to de-risk the design from stress de-rating point of view and how to improve the bottom line by following and building enough margins in the design. As designs are becoming more complex and development time is getting shorter, the chance of designing overstressed components and introducing schematic connectivity errors increases significantly which could lead to higher number of failures. This scenario is a one of typical cases where the overall product bottom line is impacted. Electronic assemblies are utilizing complex circuitry with smarter and denser ICs with more than 1000 pins. Due to sophisticated features and requirements of new designs, power dissipation and temperatures are increasing that jeopardizes the design reliability and integrity for mission critical systems. In addition to lack of acceptable product performance, mission critical and non-critical products will experience higher number of returns where it directly impacts customer confidence and cost of ownership. The challenge for today's reliability and design engineers is to perform an analysis in a timely manner at the schematic level before the first prototype to identify overstressed components and pins to prevent hardware re-spin. The intent if this paper is to demonstrate methods that should be implemented during the design phase of electronic boards, which will help the designer and the reliability analyst to detect components with high operational stress. The stress level can be power, voltage, current or temperature. Through this technique, product time to market will be reduced and decreases the risk of hardware failures during product operation. The analysis will provide best rules for schematic modeling, stress analysis and the importance of de-rating standard in a design. The paper will include the results of more than 20 analysis performed utilizing the recommended best practices and how many re-spins were prevented. This analysis can be performed on any types of components such as analog, digital and RF.
通过更低的组件压力,实现更好的底线
本文讨论了从压力降低的角度来看,拥有一种方法和能力来降低设计风险的价值,以及如何通过在设计中遵循和建立足够的余量来提高底线。随着设计变得越来越复杂,开发时间越来越短,设计压力过大的组件和引入原理图连接错误的机会大大增加,这可能导致更多的故障。这个场景是整个产品底线受到影响的典型案例之一。电子组件正在使用复杂的电路,拥有超过1000个引脚的更智能、更密集的ic。由于复杂的特性和新设计的要求,功耗和温度越来越高,危及关键任务系统设计的可靠性和完整性。除了缺乏可接受的产品性能外,关键任务和非关键产品将经历更高的回报,这直接影响到客户信心和拥有成本。当今可靠性和设计工程师面临的挑战是,在第一个原型之前,在原理图层面及时进行分析,以识别过度受力的组件和引脚,以防止硬件重新旋转。本文的目的是展示在电子电路板设计阶段应该实施的方法,这将有助于设计师和可靠性分析师检测具有高操作应力的组件。应力水平可以是功率、电压、电流或温度。通过这种技术,将缩短产品上市时间,并降低产品运行过程中硬件故障的风险。该分析将为原理图建模、应力分析和降级标准在设计中的重要性提供最佳规则。该文件将包括使用推荐的最佳实践进行的20多次分析的结果,以及防止了多少次重复旋转。这种分析可以在任何类型的组件上进行,如模拟、数字和射频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信