A proposed method for establishing partial discharge acceptance limits on API 541 and 546 sacrificial test coils

S. Haq, M. Stranges, B. Wood
{"title":"A proposed method for establishing partial discharge acceptance limits on API 541 and 546 sacrificial test coils","authors":"S. Haq, M. Stranges, B. Wood","doi":"10.1109/pcicon.2015.7435084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis (PDA) as an appropriate factory acceptance test to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from on sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a factory acceptance test (FAT). These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator and instrument. Also included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits.","PeriodicalId":191070,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference (PCIC)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference (PCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/pcicon.2015.7435084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis (PDA) as an appropriate factory acceptance test to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from on sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a factory acceptance test (FAT). These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator and instrument. Also included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits.
提出了一种建立API 541和546牺牲试验线圈局部放电接受限值的方法
最近对API标准的修订已将离线部分放电分析(PDA)确定为评估某些新型中压电机和发电机定子绕组质量的适当工厂验收测试。作为起点,API 541建议使用符合IEC 60270标准的仪器测量牺牲定子线圈的部分放电(PD)水平为100 pC(皮库仑)。在获得更多的数据之前,建议的PD水平需要购买者和制造商之间进行讨论。本文提供了牺牲线圈和定子绕组的局部放电数据,以支持局部放电验收标准的讨论。使用三种仪器在控制噪音最小化的实验室条件下对富含树脂的压固化牺牲线圈进行PD测试,并在工厂验收测试(FAT)的典型环境中进行PD测试。然后对这些线圈进行为期一周的测试,在噪声,一天中的时间,操作员和仪器的相同测量条件下。还包括来自两个完整定子绕组的离线PD数据示例。第一个是一个新的绕组,在工厂里测试了两天。第二种是使用相同方法在不同地点测试的老化绕组。仪器选择,测试位置,测量之间的间隔时间和绝缘系统结构都会影响离线PD测量。目前的证据表明,从类似的测试条件得出的统计分布比特定的PD限制更适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信